Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 21:10:E192.
doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130180.

Engaging health systems to increase colorectal cancer screening: community-clinical outreach in underserved areas of Wisconsin

Affiliations

Engaging health systems to increase colorectal cancer screening: community-clinical outreach in underserved areas of Wisconsin

Noelle K LoConte et al. Prev Chronic Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Wisconsin. Incidence and mortality rates for colorectal cancer vary by age, race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status. From 2010 through 2012, the Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Control Program awarded grants to 5 regional health systems for the purpose of planning and implementing events to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in underserved communities.

Community context: Grantees were chosen for their ability to engage community partners in reaching underserved groups including African American, Hispanic/Latino, Hmong, rural, and uninsured populations in their service areas.

Methods: Grantees identified target populations for proposed screening events, designated institutional planning teams, engaged appropriate local partner organizations, and created plans for follow-up. All grantees implemented 1 or more colorectal cancer screening events within 6 months of receiving their awards. Events were conducted in 2 phases.

Outcomes: Participating health systems organized 36 screening events and distributed 633 individual test kits; 506 kits were returned, of which 57 (9%) tested positive for colorectal abnormalities. Of attendees who received screening, 63% were uninsured or underinsured, 55% had no previous screening, 46% were of a racial/ethnic minority group, 22% had a family history of cancer, and 13% were rural residents. This project strengthened partnerships between health systems and local organizations.

Interpretation: An effective strategy for improving colorectal cancer screening rates, particularly among underserved populations, is to award health systems grants for implementing community-based screening events in conjunction with community partners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of eligible Wisconsin adults screened for colorectal cancer in conjunction with the Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Control Program screening events grant project, as a percentage of the total number offered screening. Participants (n = 633) may be counted in more than 1 category. [Table: see text]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total fecal immunochemical blood test (iFOBT) kits distributed, returned, and testing positive for abnormalities in Phases I and II of the Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Control Program colorectal cancer screening events grant project.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11–30. 10.3322/caac.21166 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wisconsin cancer facts and figures. Madison (WI): American Cancer Society, Wisconsin Division of Public Health; 2011. http://action.acscan.org/site/DocServer/WI_FactsFigures_2010_120710_L9.p.... Accessed May 14, 2013.
    1. Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(8):1611–21. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cole AM, Jackson JE, Doescher M. Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross‐sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study. Cancer Med 2012;1(3):350–6. 10.1002/cam4.40 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/colocancer/colors.htm. Accessed May 15, 2013. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms