The use of epidurals in abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of outcomes and cost
- PMID: 24263390
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438048.91139.31
The use of epidurals in abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of outcomes and cost
Abstract
Background: Ventral hernias are a common, challenging, and expensive problem for general and reconstructive surgeons. The authors assessed the impact of epidurals on morbidity following abdominal wall reconstruction for hernia.
Methods: A retrospective review of abdominal wall reconstruction patients operated on between 2007 and 2012 was performed with a specific focus on the use of epidurals. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess independent predictors of morbidity. Subgroup analyses were also performed.
Results: The study included 134 consecutive reconstructions performed by a single surgeon over a 5-year period at an academic teaching center. Patient groups were similar in terms of demographics, preoperative characteristics, hernia grade, and intraoperative characteristics. Epidural use was associated with a lower incidence of major surgical complications (19.7 percent versus 36.1 percent; p = 0.04) and medical complications (26.8 percent versus 54.1 percent; p = 0.001). A significant and independent reduction in medical morbidity (OR, 0.09; p ≤ 0.001) and unplanned reoperations (OR, 0.23; p = 0.052), was found with patients receiving epidurals. Furthermore, a notable trend toward reduced major surgical complications (OR, 0.45; p = 0.141) and cost savings (-$22,184; p = 0.01) was found in patients who received epidurals. Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in major surgical morbidity in reconstruction either with (p = 0.13) or without (p = 0.07) concurrent intra abdominal procedures when epidurals were not or were used, respectively.
Conclusions: Epidural use may be associated with reduced morbidity and cost savings in abdominal wall reconstruction. This effect appears to be related to reduced medical morbidity and shortened length of stay in patients undergoing more complex, concurrent intraabdominal hernia procedures.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, II.
References
-
- Ghazi B, Deigni O, Yezhelyev M, Losken A. Current options in the management of complex abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:488–492
-
- Sailes FC, Walls J, Guelig D, et al. Synthetic and biological mesh in component separation: A 10-year single institution review. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:696–698
-
- Paajanen H, Laine H. Operative treatment of massive ventral hernia using polypropylene mesh: A challenge for surgeon and anesthesiologist. Hernia. 2005;9:62–67
-
- Kingsnorth AN, Sivarajasingham N, Wong S, Butler M. Open mesh repair of incisional hernias with significant loss of domain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86:363–366
-
- Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: Making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16:179–183
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials