Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Nov 22:21:79.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-79.

A comparison of conventional tube and EndoFlex tube for tracheal intubation in patients with a cervical spine immobilisation

Ewelina Gaszynska  1 , Michal Stankiewicz-Rudnicki, Andrzej Wieczorek, Tomasz Gaszynski
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparison of conventional tube and EndoFlex tube for tracheal intubation in patients with a cervical spine immobilisation

Ewelina Gaszynska et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The EndoFlex is a new type of tracheal tube with an adjustable distal tip that can be bent without the use of a stylet. The aim of this study was to compare a standard endotracheal tube with the EndoFlex tracheal tube for intubation in patients with simulated cervical spine injury.

Methods: A group of 60 patients without any kind of the cervical spine injury, classified as the ASA physiological scale I or II and qualified for elective surgery procedures were intubated with the use of classical Macintosh laryngoscope, and either a standard endotracheal tube with the intubation stylet in it or EndoFlex tube without stylet. The subjects were randomized into two subgroups. All patients have had the cervical collar placed on their neck for the simulation of intubation procedure in case of the spinal injury.

Results: The intubation procedure was performed by 16 anesthetists with different experience (5-19 yrs). Time of intubation with the use of EndoFlex tube was similar to that with a the use of standard endotracheal tube and intubation stylet: Me (median) 19.5 s [IQR (interquatile range) 18-50] vs. Me 20 s [IQR 17-60] respectively (p = 0.9705). No significant additional maneuvers were necessary during intubation with the use of EndoFlex tube in comparison with standard endotracheal tube (70% vs. 56.6%) (p = 0.4220). Subjective assessment of the usability of both tubes revealed that more anesthesiologists found intubations with the use of EndoFlex more demanding than intubation with conventional tracheal tube and intubation stylet. The assessment of usability: very easy 3.3% vs. 20%, easy 83.4% vs. 56.7%, difficult 10% vs. 20% and very difficult 3.3% vs. 3.3% for standard endotracheal tube with stylet and EndoFlex, respectively.

Conclusion: In conclusion we asses, that the EndoFlex tube does not improve intubation success rate, in fact it requires more maneuvers facilitating intubation and was found to be more difficult to use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EndoFlex endotracheal tube (source: manufacturer marketing materials).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study Flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to intubation (TTI) with studied devices [median, IQR (box), range (lines)] (p = 0.9705).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative Success Ratio (CSR). (TTI–Time to intubation).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of Time To Intubation (Stylet group–white bars, EndoFlex group–grey bars).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gaszynski T, Gluszcz R, Dobielski P, Jakubiak J. Guidelines for the procedure to be used in the instance of unexpected difficulties with intratracheal intubation: Wytyczne postepowania w przypadku nieprzewidzianych trudnosci z wykonaniem intubacji dotcchawiczej. Anest Inten Terap. 2009;XLI,3:180–188. - PubMed
    1. Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, Todd MM, Sato Y, Traynelis VC. Cervical spinal motion during intubation: efficacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of complete segmental instability. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:265–270. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heath KJ. The effect of laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilization techniques. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:843–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04254.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:344–348. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei190. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yamakage M, Takahashi M, Tachibana N, Takahashi K, Namiki A. Usefulness of Endoflex endotracheal tube for oral and nasal tracheal intubations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(8):661–665. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832a0be3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types