Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study
- PMID: 24268114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.003
Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is an established noninvasive method for visualization of coronary artery disease. However, coronary CTA lacks physiological information; thus, it does not permit differentiation of ischemia-causing lesions. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamic techniques applied to standard coronary CTA images allow for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of computed FFR (FFRCT) compared with invasively measured FFR is not yet fully established.
Methods/design: HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using coronary CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) is a prospective, international, multicenter study designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFRCT for the detection and exclusion of flow-limiting obstructive coronary stenoses, as defined by invasively measured FFR as the reference standard. FFR values ≤ 0.80 will be considered to be ischemia causing. All subjects (N = 270; 10 investigative sites) will undergo coronary CTA (single- or dual-source CT scanners with a minimum of 64 slices) and invasive coronary angiography with FFR. Patients with insufficient quality of coronary CTA will be excluded. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for FFRCT, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR. Stenosis severity by coronary CTA will be evaluated by the investigative site in addition to a blinded core laboratory interpretation. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic performance of FFRCT compared with coronary CTA alone to noninvasively determine the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. The secondary end point comprises assessment of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FFRCT.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01757678.
Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; Computed tomography; Coronary CT angiography; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve.
Copyright © 2013 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;5(5):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Aug 7. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011. PMID: 21930103 Clinical Trial.
-
Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2103-2112. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01658-x. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31273632 Free PMC article.
-
A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.024. Epub 2013 Dec 11. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24332418
-
Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Jun 22;12:269-78. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S79632. eCollection 2016. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016. PMID: 27382296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017. PMID: 28666784 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;33(2):271-281. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0995-9. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27718139
-
Coronary lesion characteristics with mismatch between fractional flow reserve derived from CT and invasive catheterization in clinical practice.Heart Vessels. 2017 Apr;32(4):390-398. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0892-0. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Heart Vessels. 2017. PMID: 27624311
-
Coronary CT Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Game Changer in Noninvasive Testing.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Sep 22;19(11):112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0923-1. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28940026 Review.
-
Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Dec 14;17:817-831. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S286916. eCollection 2021. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021. PMID: 34934324 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Computed tomographic myocardial mass compared with invasive myocardial perfusion measurement.Heart. 2020 Oct;106(19):1489-1494. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316689. Epub 2020 May 29. Heart. 2020. PMID: 32471907 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical