Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;18(5):1645-57.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12157. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer

Nicola J Hall  1 , Greg P Rubin  1 , Christina Dobson  1 , David Weller  2 , Jane Wardle  3 , Mary Ritchie  4 , Colin J Rees  5
Affiliations

Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer

Nicola J Hall et al. Health Expect. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Uptake of colorectal cancer screening programmes needs to be improved or at least maintained in order to achieve projected reductions in mortality and morbidity. Understanding the origins of non-participation in screening is therefore important.

Objective: To explore the beliefs and experiences of individuals who had not responded either to their screening invitation or reminder.

Design: A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with non-participants from England's population-based colorectal cancer screening programme. Data collection and analysis were carried out using a grounded theory approach, with an emphasis on the constant comparison method, and continued until saturation (27 interviews).

Findings: The interviews provided an in-depth understanding of a range of reasons and circumstances surrounding non-participation in screening, including contextual and environmental influences as well as factors specific to the screening test. Non-participation in screening was not necessarily associated with negative attitudes towards screening or a decision to not return a kit. Reasons for non-participation in screening included not feeling that participation is personally necessary, avoiding or delaying decision making, and having some degree of intention to take part but failing to do so because of practicalities, conflicting priorities or external circumstances. Beliefs, awareness and intention change over time.

Discussion and conclusions: A range of approaches may be required to improve screening uptake. Some non-participants may already have a degree of intention to take part in screening in the future, and this group may be more responsive to interventions based on professional endorsement, repeat invitations, reminders and aids to making the test more practical.

Keywords: attitudes; behaviour; beliefs; bowel cancer screening; colorectal cancer screening; non-participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation in decision making and intention to take part at invitation, including examples of non‐participation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. CRUK . Bowel cancer statistics. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/bowel/: Cancer Research UK; accessed 13 December 2012.
    1. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H et al Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population‐based cancer registry data. The Lancet, 2011; 377: 127–138. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Programmes NCS . NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/, accessed 13 December 2012.
    1. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007; (1): CD001216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Tappenden P, Olsen AH, Patnick J, Sasieni P. Predicting the impact of the screening programme for colorectal cancer in the UK. Journal of Medical Screening, 2008; 15: 163–174. - PubMed

Publication types