Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;16(12):1717-24.
doi: 10.1038/nn.3561. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Regulation of dietary choice by the decision-making circuitry

Affiliations
Review

Regulation of dietary choice by the decision-making circuitry

Antonio Rangel. Nat Neurosci. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

To advance our understanding of how the brain makes food decisions, it is essential to combine knowledge from two fields that have not yet been well integrated: the neuro-computational basis of decision-making and the homeostatic regulators of feeding. This Review integrates these two literatures from a neuro-computational perspective, with an emphasis in describing the variables computed by different neural systems and how they affect dietary choice. We highlight what is unique about feeding decisions, the mechanisms through which metabolic and endocrine factors affect the decision-making circuitry, why making healthy food choices is difficult for many people, and key processes at work in the obesity epidemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of computations that take place before, during and after decision-making.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Description of how the goal-directed system can compute the value of a stimulus; for example, an ice-cream sundae. First, the item is mapped into the set of attributes that describe it. Second, a value is assigned to each attribute based on the current physiological state and the pleasure or pain associated with consumption of that attribute in the past. Third, the attribute values are integrated to compute an overall value for the item. There are two classes of attributes: basic attributes (such as sweetness or taste quality, depicted in blue) that are taken into account by all decision-makers and more ‘abstract’ attributes (such as health, depicted in red) that are only taken into account by those who make healthy choices. We emphasize that the actual attributes used by the goal-directed system have not been identified, and the ones highlighted here were chosen solely for the purpose of providing an example.
Figure 3
Figure 3
External (green) and internal (dark red) vicious circles in obesity.

References

    1. Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague PR. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:545–556. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kable JW, Glimcher PW. The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron. 2009;63:733–745. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams KW, Elmquist JK. From neuroanatomy to behavior: central integration of peripheral signals regulating feeding behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:1350–1355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berthoud HR. Metabolic and hedonic drives in the neural control of appetite: who is the boss? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:888–896. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenny PJ. Reward mechanisms in obesity: new insights and future directions. Neuron. 2011;69:664–679. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources