Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan;16(1):381.
doi: 10.1007/s11883-013-0381-1.

The role of glycemic index and glycemic load in cardiovascular disease and its risk factors: a review of the recent literature

Affiliations
Review

The role of glycemic index and glycemic load in cardiovascular disease and its risk factors: a review of the recent literature

Arash Mirrahimi et al. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

A number of meta-analyses of cohort studies have assessed the impact of glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) on cardiovascular outcomes. The picture that emerges is that for women, a significant association appears to exist between the consumption of high GL/GI diets and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This association appears to be stronger in those with greater adiposity and possibly in those with diabetes, although these findings are not uniform. There is also an indication that raised CRP levels may be reduced, which has special implications for women whose CRP levels, as an emerging CVD risk factor, may be higher than men. For men, the situation is not as clear-cut. Although some studies show association, the meta-analyses have not demonstrated a significant direct association with CVD, despite current evidence that risk factors, including LDL-C, may be reduced on low-GI diets. Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis, increases in dietary GL have been associated with increased risk of diabetes, another CVD risk factor, in both men and women. Studies in men expressing relative risk of CVD in relation to GL and GI, with corresponding confidence intervals, are needed to provide the necessary power for future meta-analyses on this topic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25955 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2008 Dec 17;300(23):2742-53 - PubMed
    1. J Hypertens. 2012 Jul;30(7):1440-3 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jan;87(1):114-25 - PubMed
    1. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Mar;23(3):227-34 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources