Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;156(2):375-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1935-2. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

Patients' anxiety around incidental brain tumors: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Patients' anxiety around incidental brain tumors: a qualitative study

Harshita Jagadeesh et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Incidental findings are common on MRI. Our study examined how patients are told about their incidental finding as well as anxiety until the neurosurgical consultation and afterward.

Methods: Qualitative research methodology was used. Thirty-two participants were interviewed using open-ended questions. Answers were transcribed and analyzed for themes.

Results: The level of patient satisfaction for the initial breaking of the news averaged 4.1 (range 1-5). Four themes were identified: (1) emotional stress over incidental findings are partially dependent on how the news was communicated; (2) breaking worrisome news is best done in person, but telephone communication can sometimes be acceptable; (3) patients are divided about how much information they wish to get about incidental findings before going for an MRI; (4) waiting for the neurosurgical consultation is a stressful time without adequate support.

Conclusions: When dealing with an unexpected MRI finding, patients are anxious about the situation. Our study exposes ways the experience could be made more comfortable for patients right from the start, from being told the news in a calm and sympathetic manner, to providing support for patients while they wait for a meeting with a neurosurgeon, to expediting the neurosurgical consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barnett MM. Effect of breaking bad news on patients' perceptions of doctors. J R Soc Med. 2002;95:343–347. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.7.343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borra RJ, Sorensen AG. Incidental findings in brain MRI research: what do we owe our subjects? J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:848–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruera E, Palmer JL, Pace E, Zhang K, Willey J, Strasser F, Bennett MI. A randomized, controlled trial of physician postures when breaking bad news to cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2007;21:501–505. doi: 10.1177/0269216307081184. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burgers C, Beukeboom CJ, Sparks L. How the doc should (not) talk: when breaking bad news with negations influences patients' immediate responses and medical adherence intentions. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drazin D, Spitler K, Cekic M, Patel A, Hanna G, Shirzadi A, Chu R. Incidental finding of tumor while investigating subarachnoid hemorrhage: ethical considerations and practical strategies. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 - PubMed