Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Mar;29(3):507-13.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2701-0. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia

Alison Brenner  1 , Kirsten Howard, Carmen Lewis, Stacey Sheridan, Trisha Crutchfield, Sarah Hawley, Dan Reuland, Christine Kistler, Michael Pignone
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia

Alison Brenner et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of three methods of values clarification (VCM): balance sheet; rating and ranking; and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) on decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among adults in the US and Australia.

Methods: Using online panels managed by a survey research organization in the US and Australia, we recruited adults ages 50-75 at average risk for CRC for an online survey. Those eligible were randomized to one of the three VCM tasks. CRC screening options were described in terms of five key attributes: reduction in risk of CRC incidence and mortality; nature of the screening test; screening frequency; complications from screening; and chance of requiring a colonoscopy (as initial or follow-up testing). Main outcomes included self-reported most important attribute and unlabeled screening test preference by VCM and by country, assessed after the VCM.

Results: A total of 920 participants were enrolled; 51 % were Australian; mean age was 59.0; 87.0 % were white; 34.2 % had a 4-year college degree; 42.8 % had household incomes less than $45,000 USD per year; 44.9 % were up to date with CRC screening. Most important attribute differed across VCM groups: the rating and ranking group was more likely to choose risk reduction as most important attribute (69.8 %) than the balance sheet group (54.7 %) or DCE (49.3 %), p < 0.0001; most important attribute did not vary by country (p = 0.236). The fecal occult blood test (FOBT)-like test was the most frequently preferred test overall (55.9 %). Unlabeled test choice did not differ meaningfully by VCM. Australians were more likely to prefer the FOBT (AU 66.2 % vs. US 45.1 %, OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.8, 3.1). Few participants favored no screening (US: 9.2 %, AU: 6.2 %).

Conclusions: Screening test attribute importance varied by VCM, but not by country. FOBT was more commonly preferred by Australians than by Americans, but test preferences were heterogeneous in both countries.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01558583.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Parkin DM, et al. Global burden of cancer in 2008: a systematic analysis of disability-adjusted life-years in 12 world regions. Lancet. 2012;380(9856):1840–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60919-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Cancer Series. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring report: phase 2, July 2008–June 2011. 2011;(65). Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737421401. Accessed October 3, 2013.
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures. 2012. Available at: http://www.cancer.org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/acs/groups/content/@e.... Accessed October 3, 2013.
    1. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658. Available at: http://www.annals.org/content/149/9/638.abstract. - PubMed
    1. Pignone MP, Rich M, Teutsch S. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–141. Available at: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=13791134. Accessed November 9, 2012. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data