Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;24(5):753-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1368-x. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty

Affiliations

Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty

Giovanni Merolla et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Cemented polyethylene devices are the prostheses implanted more frequently, but there is no agreement on the optimal glenoid component design. In this study, bone mineral density (BMD) adjacent to cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components was assessed to gain insights into the characteristics of glenoid bone as a potential risk factor implicated in the failure of shoulder arthroplasty.

Patients and methods: Twenty-two subjects were examined at an average follow-up of 31 months using the Constant-Murley score (CS) and multi-detector computed tomography. BMD was measured in 5 regions of interest (ROIs) at the sites where radiolucent lines are usually detected. BMD differences among the ROIs were tested. The relationship between BMD and a number of variables (CS subscores, age, gender, follow-up duration) was explored.

Results: There was a significant increase in CS scores (p<0.05). Significantly different BMD (p=0.0039) was found in the 5 ROIs, especially between ROIs 2 and 5 (p=0.016, Bonferroni's test) and between ROIs 3 and 5 (p=0.005, Bonferroni's test). BMD was lower in ROI 1 than ROI 3 and in ROI 2 than ROI 4, but the difference was not significant.

Discussion: The heterogeneous BMD distribution may be related to: (1) an interindividual variability in glenoid BMD; (2) the fixation technique; or (3) the different bone response to eccentric loading of the prosthetic head on the glenoid component.

Conclusions: BMD analysis may contribute to extent our knowledge on glenoid component loosening and encourage further techniques of glenoid fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chir Organi Mov. 2009 Apr;93 Suppl 1:S29-34 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 May;94(5):671-7 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1928-36 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):1032-7 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Jul;23(5):521-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources