Maxillary distraction osteogenesis at Le Fort-I level induces bone apposition at infraorbital rim
- PMID: 24276594
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1149-2
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis at Le Fort-I level induces bone apposition at infraorbital rim
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there is any remodeling of bone at infraorbital rim following maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) at Le Fort-I level.
Materials and methods: Twelve adult subjects in the age range of 17-21 years with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate underwent advancement of the maxilla by DO. The effect of maxillary DO on the infraorbital rim remodeling was evaluated from lateral cephalograms recorded prior to the DO (T0), at the end of DO (T1), and at least 2-years after the DO (T2) by Walker's analysis. The ANOVA and two-tailed t test were used and probability value (P value) 0.05 was considered as statistically significant level.
Results: There was anterior movement of maxilla by 9.22 ± 3.27 mm and 7.67 ± 3.99 mm at the end of immediate (T1) and long-term (T2) follow-up of maxillary DO, respectively. The Walker's analysis showed 1.49 ± 1.22 mm and 2.31 ± 1.81 mm anterior movement of the infraorbital margin (Orbitale point) at the end of T1 and T2, respectively (P < 0.01). This apposition of bone at the infraorbital rim region further improved the facial profile of these patients.
Conclusion: The advancement of maxilla by distraction osteogenesis at Le Fort-I level induced significant bone apposition at infraorbital rim.
Clinical relevance: Patients with mild midface hypoplasia who would otherwise may be candidates for osteotomy at Le Fort-II or Le Fort-III level may benefit from maxillary distraction at Le Fort-I level.
Similar articles
-
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique.J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):746-51. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000735. J Craniofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24777017
-
Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1532-1541. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a97ebc. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 24281581
-
Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis.J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Sep;17(5):992-7. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000234980.76992.69. J Craniofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 17003631
-
Cleft Lip and Palate: Le Fort I Distraction Using an Internal Device.Clin Plast Surg. 2021 Jul;48(3):407-417. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 May 8. Clin Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34051894 Review.
-
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15509923 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Effect of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) on Nasal Index in Adult Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Mar;15(1):12-7. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0794-1. Epub 2015 Apr 28. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016. PMID: 26929547 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical