Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;42(4):815-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Surgical management of fecal incontinence

Affiliations
Review

Surgical management of fecal incontinence

Joshua I S Bleier et al. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

The surgical approach to treating fecal incontinence is complex. After optimal medical management has failed, surgery remains the best option for restoring function. Patient factors, such as prior surgery, anatomic derangements, and degree of incontinence, help inform the astute surgeon regarding the most appropriate option. Many varied approaches to surgical management are available, ranging from more conservative approaches, such as anal canal bulking agents and neuromodulation, to more aggressive approaches, including sphincter repair, anal cerclage techniques, and muscle transposition. Efficacy and morbidity of these approaches also range widely, and this article presents the data and operative considerations for these approaches.

Keywords: Bulking agents; Fecal incontinence; Management; Sacral neuromodulation; Sphincter; Sphincteroplasty; Surgical.

PubMed Disclaimer