Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 10;2(3):1644-60.
doi: 10.3390/cancers2031644.

The Clinical Significance of Unknown Sequence Variants in BRCA Genes

Affiliations

The Clinical Significance of Unknown Sequence Variants in BRCA Genes

Valentina Calò et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes are responsible for a large proportion of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers. Many highly penetrant predisposition alleles have been identified and include frameshift or nonsense mutations that lead to the translation of a truncated protein. Other alleles contain missense mutations, which result in amino acid substitution and intronic variants with splicing effect. The discovery of variants of uncertain/unclassified significance (VUS) is a result that can complicate rather than improve the risk assessment process. VUSs are mainly missense mutations, but also include a number of intronic variants and in-frame deletions and insertions. Over 2,000 unique BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants have been identified, located throughout the whole gene (Breast Cancer Information Core Database (BIC database)). Up to 10-20% of the BRCA tests report the identification of a variant of uncertain significance. There are many methods to discriminate deleterious/high-risk from neutral/low-risk unclassified variants (i.e., analysis of the cosegregation in families of the VUS, measure of the influence of the VUSs on the wild-type protein activity, comparison of sequence conservation across multiple species), but only an integrated analysis of these methods can contribute to a real interpretation of the functional and clinical role of the discussed variants. The aim of our manuscript is to review the studies on BRCA VUS in order to clarify their clinical relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A representation of the multi-determinant approach to use for BRCA-VUS clinical classification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic representation of a multi-parametrical analysis method proposed to help clinicians to individuate the classes of risk.

References

    1. Miki Y., Swensen J., Shattuck-Eidens D., Futreal P.A., Harshman K., Tavtigian S., Liu Q., Cochran C., Bennett L.M., Ding W., et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene brca1. Science. 1994;266:66–71. - PubMed
    1. Wooster R., Bignell G., Lancaster J., Swift S., Seal S., Mangion J., Collins N., Gregory S., Gumbs C., Micklem G. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene brca2. Nature. 1995;378:789–792. doi: 10.1038/378789a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palma M., Ristori E., Ricevuto E., Giannini G., Gulino A. Brca1 and brca2: The genetic testing and the current management options for mutation carriers. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2006;57:1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gulati A.P., Domchek S.M. The clinical management of brca1 and brca2 mutation carriers. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2008;10:47–53. doi: 10.1007/s11912-008-0008-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russo A., Calo V., Agnese V., Bruno L., Corsale S., Augello C., Gargano G., Barbera F., Cascio S., Intrivici C., Rinaldi G., Gulotta G., Macaluso M., Surmacz E., Giordano A., Gebbia N., Bazan V. Brca1 genetic testing in 106 breast and ovarian cancer families from southern italy (sicily): A mutation analyses. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2007;105:267–276. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9456-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources