Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 25;8(11):e80051.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080051. eCollection 2013.

Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study

Yew Kong Lee et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Patient decisions are influenced by their personal values. However, there is a lack of clarity and attention on the concept of patient values in the clinical context despite clear emphasis on patient values in evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. The aim of the study was to explore the concept of patient values in the context of making decisions about insulin initiation among people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods and findings: We conducted individual in-depth interviews with people with type 2 diabetes who were making decisions about insulin treatment. Participants were selected purposively to achieve maximum variation. A semi-structured topic guide was used to guide the interviews which were audio-recorded and analysed using a thematic approach. We interviewed 21 participants between January 2011 and March 2012. The age range of participants was 28-67 years old. Our sample comprised 9 women and 12 men. Three main themes, 'treatment-specific values', 'life goals and philosophies', and 'personal and social background', emerged from the analysis. The patients reported a variety of insulin-specific values, which were negative and/or positive beliefs about insulin. They framed insulin according to their priorities and philosophies in life. Patients' decisions were influenced by sociocultural (e.g. religious background) and personal backgrounds (e.g. family situations).

Conclusions: This study highlighted the need for expanding the current concept of patient values in medical decision making. Clinicians should address more than just values related to treatment options. Patient values should include patients' priorities, life philosophy and their background. Current decision support tools, such as patient decision aids, should consider these new dimensions when clarifying patient values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A conceptual model of patient values.

References

    1. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. London, England: Churchill Livingstone.
    1. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, et al. (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27: 1361–1367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60: 301–312. - PubMed
    1. O’connor A (2001) Using patient decision aids to promote evidence-based decision making. Evidence Based Medicine 6: 100–102. - PubMed
    1. Barratt A (2008) Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient education and counseling 73: 407–412. - PubMed

Publication types