Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 25;8(11):e80263.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080263. eCollection 2013.

Dystromirs as serum biomarkers for monitoring the disease severity in Duchenne muscular Dystrophy

Affiliations

Dystromirs as serum biomarkers for monitoring the disease severity in Duchenne muscular Dystrophy

Irina T Zaharieva et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Duchenne muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene that disrupt the open reading frame, while in frame mutations result in Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy (UCMD) is due to mutations affecting collagen VI genes. Specific muscle miRNAs (dystromirs) are potential non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring the outcome of therapeutic interventions and disease progression. We quantified miR-1, miR-133a,b, miR-206 and miR-31 in serum from patients with DMD, BMD, UCMD and healthy controls. MiR-1, miR-133a,b and miR-206 were upregulated in DMD, but unchanged in UCMD compared to controls. Milder DMD patients had higher levels of dystromirs than more severely affected patients. Patients with low forced vital capacity (FVC) values, indicating respiratory muscle weakness, had low levels of serum miR-1 and miR-133b. There was no significant difference in the level of the dystromirs in BMD compared to controls. We also assessed the effect of dystrophin restoration on the expression of the five dystromirs in serum of DMD patients treated systemically for 12 weeks with antisense oligomer eteplirsen that induces skipping of exon 51 in the dystrophin gene. The dystromirs were also analysed in muscle biopsies of DMD patients included in a single dose intramuscular eteplirsen clinical trial. Our analysis detected a trend towards normalization of these miRNA between the pre- and post-treatment samples of the systemic trial, which however failed to reach statistical significance. This could possibly be due to the small number of patients and the short duration of these clinical trials. Although longer term studies are needed to clarify the relationship between dystrophin restoration following therapeutic intervention and the level of circulating miRNAs, our results indicate that miR-1 and miR-133 can be considered as exploratory biomarkers for monitoring the progression of muscle weakness and indirectly the remaining muscle mass in DMD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: FM has served on scientific advisory boards for Acceleron Pharma, Genzyme, AVI BioPharma, Debiopharma Group, GlaxoSmithKline, Prosensa, and Santhera Pharmaceutical, has received research support from AVI BioPharma, and has received funding for trials from AVI, Trophos and PTC. RK is employed full time as Distinguished Scientist by Sarepta Therapeutics and owns Sarepta stock. KB has served on scientific advisory boards for Acceleron, AMT, AVI Biopharma, Debiopharm, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Prosensa, PTC and Santhera and has received funding for trials from AVI and PTC. VS has served on scientific advisory boards for Acceleron, Prosensa, Santhera Pharmaceutical, NicOx, Pfizer and Genzyme and has received funding for trials from GlaxoSmithKline, Prosensa and Genzyme. AF is Principal Investigator of GSK and Prosensa Therapeutics ongoing trials in Italy. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Serum levels of the analysed dystromirs in DMD, BMD, UCMD and controls.
Absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum samples of 44 DMD, 5 BMD, 16 UCMD patients and 14 healthy controls. The data are presented in a logarithmic scale as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNAs (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). P-values derived from t-test are presented with *, **, *** and correspond to p <0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001 respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Serum levels of the analysed dystromirs and functional ability of DMD patients.
A. MiR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in ambulant and non-ambulant DMD patients. B. Correlation analysis between the level of the dystromirs and the NSAA scores. The data are presented in a logarithmic scale as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNAs (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). P-values derived from t-test are presented with **, *** and correspond to p<0.01 and p<0.001 respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Serum level of the analysed dystromirs in DMD patients according to clinical variables.
Level of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum samples of DMD patients: A. without the need of scoliosis surgery and with scoliosis surgery performed or recommended; B. not on glucocorticoid treatment, on intermittent or on daily steroid regimen; C. without cardiomyopathy and with cardiac abnormality. The data are presented in a logarithmic scale as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNAs (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). P-values derived from t-test are presented with *, ** and correspond to p <0.05 and p<0.01 respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between the level of the analysed dystromirs in DMD and the FVC values.
Linear regression analysis between the levels of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum samples and FVC scores in DMD patients showed correlation between the level of miR-1 (p = 0.0034, r2 = 0.34) and miR-133b (p = 0.0035, r2 = 0.34) with the FVC scores. The data are presented as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNA s (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). Regression lines are also presented.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Age profile of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum samples.
Level of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum samples according to the age of the: A. DMD patients; B. UCMD patients; C. healthy controls. The data are presented as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNAs (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). Regression line is also presented.
Figure 6
Figure 6. miRNAs as biomarkers for the outcome of therapeutic interventions: Systemic eteplirsen treatment trial.
Absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b in serum of: A. DMD patients before treatment with eteplirsen (pre-treatment), after treatment (post-treatment) and controls; B. low responders, responders and good responders; C. patients who received low dose and patients with high dose of eteplirsen. The data are presented in a logarithmic scale as miRNA copy number per ml normalized to the spiked-in C. elegance miRNAs (cel-miR-54, cel-miR-39, cel-miR-238). P-values derived from two-tailed t-test are presented with *, *** and correspond to p <0.05 and p<0.001 respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7. miRNAs as biomarkers for the outcome of therapeutic interventions: Intramuscular eteplirsen treatment trial.
MiR-1, miR-206, miR-31, miR-133a and miR-133b expression in: A. untreated and treated muscle biopsy samples and controls; B. patients who received low dose and patients with high dose of eteplirsen. The data are presented in a logarithmic scale as relative fold change with respect to the control samples and normalized to U6 snRNA expression. P-values derived from two-tailed t-test are presented with *** and correspond to p<0.001.

References

    1. Mendell JR, Shilling C, Leslie ND, Flanigan KM, al-Dahhak R, et al. (2012) Evidence-based path to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol 71: 304–13. - PubMed
    1. Moat SJ, Bradley DM, Salmon R, Clarke A, Hartley L (2013) Newborn bloodspot screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: 21 years experience in Wales (UK). Eur J Hum Genet doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bushby KM, Thambyayah M, Gardner-Medwin D (1991) Prevalence and incidence of Becker muscular dystrophy. Lancet 337: 1022–4. - PubMed
    1. Manzur AY, Kinali M, Muntoni F (2008) Update on the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Dis Child 93: 986–90. - PubMed
    1. Jimenez-Mallebrera C, Brown SC, Sewry CA, Muntoni F (2005) Congenital muscular dystrophy: molecular and cellular aspects. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 809–23. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types