Analysis of protective and cytotoxic immune responses in vivo against metabolically inactivated and untreated cells of a mutagenized tumor line (requirements for tumor immunogenicity)
- PMID: 2428514
- DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(86)90142-5
Analysis of protective and cytotoxic immune responses in vivo against metabolically inactivated and untreated cells of a mutagenized tumor line (requirements for tumor immunogenicity)
Abstract
The immunogenicity of a mutagenized subline (ESb-D) of the weakly immunogenic T-cell lymphoma L 5178 Y ESb has been characterized. The injection of 10(6) ESb-D cells ip did not establish lethal tumors in untreated DBA/2 mice but established tumors in sublethally irradiated mice. Injection of ESb-D cells into otherwise untreated DBA/2 mice established also a state of protective immunity against the subsequent injection of otherwise lethal doses of ESb tumor cells. Protection was only obtained after injection of intact but not UV-irradiated or mitomycin-C-treated ESb-D cells. A direct T-cell-mediated cytotoxic activity was also demonstrable in the spleen cells of DBA/2 mice after injection of ESb-D cells but not ESb cells. The cytotoxic activity was variant specific for ESb-D target cells, and it was induced only with intact but not UV-irradiated or mitomycin C-treated ESb-D cells. This suggested that the induction of protective and cytotoxic immunity may require the persistence of the antigen or unusually high antigen doses. The in vivo priming for a secondary in vitro cytotoxic response, in contrast, was achieved with intact and also with mitomycin C-treated ESb-D cells but again not with UV-irradiated ESb-D cells. This indicated that the metabolic activity was a minimal requirement for the in vivo immunogenicity of the ESb-D tumor line. The secondary cytotoxic activity was demonstrable on ESb-D and ESb target cells and could be restimulated in vitro about equally well with ESb-D and ESb cells. But the in vivo priming was again only obtained with ESb-D cells and not with ESb cells. These experiments thus demonstrated that the requirements for immunogenicity are more stringent in vivo than in vitro, and more stringent for the induction of direct cytotoxic and protective immunity in vivo than for the in vivo priming for secondary in vitro responses.
Similar articles
-
Alanine inhibits cytotoxic responses: its production by different tumor cell lines explains differences in their immunogenicity.Cancer Detect Prev. 1988;11(3-6):151-6. Cancer Detect Prev. 1988. PMID: 3134127
-
Release of L-alanine by tumor cells.J Immunol. 1986 Aug 15;137(4):1383-6. J Immunol. 1986. PMID: 3488347
-
Antigenic variation in cancer metastasis: immune escape versus immune control.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982;1(3):241-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00046830. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982. PMID: 6985248
-
New antigens presented on tumor cells can cause immune rejection without influencing the frequency of tumor-specific cytolytic T cells.Cell Immunol. 1987 Oct 15;109(2):338-48. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(87)90317-0. Cell Immunol. 1987. PMID: 3117377
-
Recruitment and activation of tumor-specific immune T cells in situ. CD8+ cells predominate the secondary response in sponge matrices and exert both delayed-type hypersensitivity-like and cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity.J Immunol. 1989 Jul 1;143(1):379-85. J Immunol. 1989. PMID: 2499633
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources