Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 27;3(11):e004121.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004121.

Time to publication for NIHR HTA programme-funded research: a cohort study

Fay Chinnery  1 , Amanda Young, Jennie Goodman, Martin Ashton-Key, Ruairidh Milne
Affiliations

Time to publication for NIHR HTA programme-funded research: a cohort study

Fay Chinnery et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the time to publication of primary research and evidence syntheses funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme published as a monograph in Health Technology Assessment and as a journal article in the wider biomedical literature.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Primary research and evidence synthesis projects funded by the HTA Programme were included in the cohort if they were registered in the NIHR research programmes database and was planned to submit the draft final report for publication in Health Technology Assessment on or before 9 December 2011.

Main outcome measures: The median time to publication and publication at 30 months in Health Technology Assessment and in an external journal were determined by searching the NIHR research programmes database and HTA Programme website.

Results: Of 458 included projects, 184 (40.2%) were primary research projects and 274 (59.8%) were evidence syntheses. A total of 155 primary research projects had a completion date; the median time to publication was 23 months (26.5 and 35.5 months to publish a monograph and to publish in an external journal, respectively) and 69% were published within 30 months. The median time to publication of HTA-funded trials (n=126) was 24 months and 67.5% were published within 30 months. Among the evidence syntheses with a protocol online date (n=223), the median time to publication was 25.5 months (28 months to publication as a monograph), but only 44.4% of evidence synthesis projects were published in an external journal. 65% of evidence synthesis studies had been published within 30.0 months.

Conclusions: Research funded by the HTA Programme publishes promptly. The importance of Health Technology Assessment was highlighted as the median time to publication was 9 months shorter for a monograph than an external journal article.

Keywords: STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of projects in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative percentage of Health Technology Assessment-funded primary research (studies with a study completion date). Publication rate in the Health Technology Assessment monograph versus other peer-reviewed biomedical journals and time to the first publication anywhere.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative percentage of Health Technology Assessment-funded evidence syntheses (studies with a protocol online date). Publication rate in the Health Technology Assessment monograph versus other peer-reviewed biomedical journals and time to the first publication anywhere.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented as abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):MR000005. - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86–9 - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, et al. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1987;8:343–53 - PubMed
    1. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:iii, ix–xi, 1–193 - PubMed
    1. Suñé P, Suñé JM, Montoro JB. Positive outcomes influence the rate and time to publication, but not the impact factor of publications of clinical trial results. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e54583. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources