Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 15;2(12):1421-4.
doi: 10.1242/bio.20136379.

Does an instrumented treadmill correctly measure the ground reaction forces?

Affiliations

Does an instrumented treadmill correctly measure the ground reaction forces?

Patrick A Willems et al. Biol Open. .

Abstract

Since the 1990s, treadmills have been equipped with multi-axis force transducers to measure the three components of the ground reaction forces during walking and running. These measurements are correctly performed if the whole treadmill (including the motor) is mounted on the transducers. In this case, the acceleration of the treadmill centre of mass relative to the reference frame of the laboratory is nil. The external forces exerted on one side of the treadmill are thus equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the external forces exerted on the other side. However, uncertainty exists about the accuracy of these measures: due to friction between the belt and the tread-surface, due to the motor pulling the belt, some believe that it is not possible to correctly measure the horizontal components of the forces exerted by the feet on the belt. Here, we propose a simple model of an instrumented treadmill and we demonstrate (1) that the forces exerted by the subject moving on the upper part of the treadmill are accurately transmitted to the transducers placed under it and (2) that all internal forces - including friction - between the parts of the treadmill are cancelling each other.

Keywords: Force transducers; Ground reaction forces; Instrumented treadmill; Locomotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Schema of an instrumented treadmill.
The interrupted arrows represent the direction of the movement of the belt. For further explanations, see text.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Diagram of the fore–aft components of the external forces applied on an instrumented treadmill and of the internal forces between the different components of the treadmill.
For further explanations, see text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alton F., Baldey L., Caplan S., Morrissey M. C. (1998). A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 13, 434–440 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00012-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belli A., Bui P., Berger A., Geyssant A., Lacour J. R. (2001). A treadmill ergometer for three-dimensional ground reaction forces measurement during walking. J. Biomech. 34, 105–112 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00125-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavagna G. A. (1975). Force platforms as ergometers. J. Appl. Physiol. 39, 174–179. - PubMed
    1. Crétual A., Fusco N. (2011). Additional energetic cost due to belt speed variations when walking on a treadmill. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 21, 551–556 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gosseye T. P., Willems P. A., Heglund N. C. (2010). Biomechanical analysis of running in weightlessness on a treadmill equipped with a subject loading system. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 110, 709–728 10.1007/s00421-010-1549-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources