Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Dec;29(12):2012-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.075.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cartilage status: a comparison between young men with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cartilage status: a comparison between young men with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Hong Li et al. Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the cartilage status of the knee joints using magnetic resonance imaging at least 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in young adult men.

Methods: Thirty young male patients with unilateral ACLR and 15 age-matched and body mass index--matched healthy men (controls) participated in this study. All participants underwent quantitative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Three-dimensional dual-echo steady-state sagittal images were segmented using solid model software to calculate the mean cartilage thickness, and multi-echo sagittal images were segmented with Siemens software (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) to determine the T2 relaxation time of each cartilage plate.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean thickness of each cartilage plate between the ACLR and control groups (P = .9616 for lateral femoral cartilage, P = .5962 for lateral tibial cartilage, P = .9328 for patellar cartilage, P = .9712 for trochlear cartilage, P = .4408 for medial femoral cartilage, and P = .1933 for medial tibial cartilage). The ACLR group had significantly higher T2 values than the control group in the lateral femoral cartilage (P < .001), lateral tibia (P = .0011), trochlea (P = .0028), medial femur (P < .001), and medial tibia (P < .001). In addition, the patella showed no difference in T2 values between the 2 groups (P = .2152). The medial compartment cartilage showed a much higher percentage change in cartilage T2 values in the ACLR group.

Conclusions: Although no difference in cartilage thickness was detected between the ACLR group and the control group, the mean T2 relaxation time in the ACLR patients was significantly longer than that in control subjects.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources