Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1)
- PMID: 24287316
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.011
Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1)
Abstract
Background: Surgical innovation is essential for progress of surgical science, but its implementation comes with potential harms during the learning phase. The Balliol Collaboration has recommended a set of guidelines (Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study [IDEAL]) that permit innovation while minimizing complications.
Objective: To utilize the IDEAL model of surgical innovation in the development of a novel surgical technique, robotic kidney transplantation (RKT) with regional hypothermia, and describe the process of discovery and development.
Design, setting, and participants: Phase 0 (simulation) studies included the establishment of techniques for pelvic cooling, graft placement in a robotic prostatectomy model, and simulation of the RKT procedure in a cadaveric model. Phase 1 (innovation) studies began in January 2013 and involved treatment of a highly selective small group of patients (n=7), using the principles utilized in the phase 0 studies, at a tertiary referral center.
Intervention: IDEAL model implementation in the development of RKT with regional hypothermia.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: For phase 0 studies, the outcomes evaluated included pelvic and body temperature measurements, and technical feasibility assessment. The primary outcome during phase 1 was post-transplant graft function. Other outcomes measured were operative and ischemic times, perioperative complications, and intracorporeal graft surface temperature.
Results and limitations: Phase 0 (simulation phase): Pelvic cooling to 15-20(o)C was achieved reproducibly. Using the surgical approach developed for robotic radical prostatectomy, vascular and ureterovesical anastomoses could be done without redocking the robot. Phase 1 (innovation phase): All patients underwent live-donor RKT in the lithotomy position. All grafts functioned immediately. Mean console, anastomotic, and warm ischemia times were 154 min, 29 min, and 2 min, respectively. One patient was re-explored on postoperative day 1.
Conclusions: Adherence to the IDEAL guidelines put forth by the Balliol Collaboration provided a practical framework for the establishment of a novel surgical procedure, RKT with regional hypothermia, without exposing the initial patients to unacceptable risk.
Patient summary: The IDEAL model allows safe introduction of new surgical techniques without compromising patient outcomes.
Keywords: Hypothermia; IDEAL guidelines; Kidney; Kidney transplantation; Robotics.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a).Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.006. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24388099 Clinical Trial.
-
Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL phase 2a-b).Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.055. Epub 2014 Mar 4. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24631408
-
Minimally invasive kidney transplantation: perioperative considerations and key 6-month outcomes.Transplantation. 2015 Feb;99(2):316-23. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000590. Transplantation. 2015. PMID: 25606784
-
Techniques to Ameliorate the Impact of Second Warm Ischemic Time on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.Transplant Proc. 2018 Dec;50(10):3144-3151. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Transplant Proc. 2018. PMID: 30577180 Review.
-
Robotic kidney transplantation: dream or future?Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Mar;28(2):139-142. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000476. Curr Opin Urol. 2018. PMID: 29303915 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic renal transplantation: Current status.J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):35-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147683. J Minim Access Surg. 2015. PMID: 25598597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Our Experience and Literature Review.Curr Transplant Rep. 2015;2(2):122-126. doi: 10.1007/s40472-015-0051-z. Curr Transplant Rep. 2015. PMID: 26000230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic assisted kidney transplantation.Indian J Urol. 2014 Jul;30(3):287-92. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.135669. Indian J Urol. 2014. PMID: 25097315 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with a novel self-assessment system and feedback discussion: a phase 1 surgical trial following the IDEAL guidelines.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec;401(8):1123-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1466-4. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016. PMID: 27329105 Clinical Trial.
-
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?World J Transplant. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):163-174. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.163. World J Transplant. 2022. PMID: 36051450 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical