Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:632790.
doi: 10.1155/2013/632790. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

Damage of stone baskets by endourologic lithotripters: a laboratory study of 5 lithotripters and 4 basket types

Affiliations

Damage of stone baskets by endourologic lithotripters: a laboratory study of 5 lithotripters and 4 basket types

Jens Cordes et al. Adv Urol. 2013.

Abstract

Background. In some cases, the ureteral stone is simultaneously stabilized by a stone basket when endourologic lithotripsy is performed. This stabilization can be either on purpose or by accident. By accident means that an impaction in the ureter occurs by an extraction of a stone with a basket. A stabilization on purpose means to avoid a retropulsion of the stone into the kidney during lithotripsy. At this part of the operation, stone baskets have been frequently damaged. This severing of wires can lead to ureteral trauma because of hook formation. Material and Methods. In a laboratory setting, the time and the pulse numbers were measured until breaking the wires from four different nitinol stone baskets by using five different lithotripsy devices. The endpoint was gross visibledamage to the wire and loss of electric conduction. Results. The Ho:YAG laser and the ultrasonic device were able to destroy almost all the wires. The ballistic devices and the electrohydraulic device were able to destroy thin wires. Conclusion. The operating surgeon should know the risk of damagefor every lithotripter. The Ho:YAG-laser and the ultrasonic device should be classified as dangerous for the basket wire with all adverse effects to the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
All four different basket types from left to right are as follows: (i) Dormia (Mentor Porgès), 4 helical wires (diameter 0.25 mm), 3.5 F, nitinol, (ii) Dormia (Mentor Porgès), 4 helical wires (diameter 0.18 mm), 2.5 F, nitinol, (iii) Epflex, tipless, plaited basket (wire diameter 0.127 mm), 2.5 F, nitinol, and (iv) Equadus (OptiMed), tipless basket, 4 wires (diameter 0.07 mm), 1.8 F, nitinol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The schematic drawing of the experimental setup. The basket wire is fixed in a holding instrument under water. The incident angle of the lithotripter is 90°. The ohmic resistance of the basket wire is measured by an ohmmeter.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The EHL destroyed all tipless baskets wires in a range from 1 to 4 sec/fewer than 4 to 18 pulses. The one 3,5 Dormia basket was destroyed after 9 sec/40 pulses.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Destroyed (a) and intact (b) probes of the electrohydraulic device (magnification of 60).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Electrokinetic device (Lithorapid) with destruction of two 1.8 F tipless baskets after 16 or 26 pulses and seconds.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pneumatic-ballistic device (Lithoclast) for the destruction of all 1.8 F tipless baskets, 3 of four 2.5 F tipless baskets, and one of four 2.5 F Dormia baskets. For the 1.8 F tipless baskets, the device just needed less than one second/one pulse. For the bigger wires, the device needed fewer than 5 sec/20 pulses.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The ultrasonic lithotripter destroyed all baskets wires with the exception of one 2.5 F tipless basket. The destruction took place from 1 to 9 sec.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The Hol:YAG laser destroyed all baskets wires with the exception of one 3.5 F Dormia basket. The destruction took place from 1 to 9 sec/from 1 to 52 pulses mostly after one pulse.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Over all the four basket types, the tipless 1.8 CH basket has the lowest resistance.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Over all the lithotripters, the laser and the ultrasonic device have the lowest ratio of unimpaired wires.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee M, Bariol SV. Evolution of stone management in Australia. The British Journal of Urology International. 2011;108(supplement 2):29–33. - PubMed
    1. Raynal G, Merlet B, Traxer O. In-hospital stays for urolithiasis: analysis of French national data. Progres en Urologie. 2011;21(7):459–462. - PubMed
    1. Smith AD, Baldlani G, Bagley D, et al., editors. Textbook of Endourology. 2nd edition. Ontario, Canada: BC Decker Publishing; 2007.
    1. Gallentine ML, Bishoff JT, Harmon WJ. The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal. Journal of Endourology. 2001;15(9):911–914. - PubMed
    1. Teichman JMH, Kamerer AD. Use of the holmium: YAG laser for the impacted stone basket. Journal of Urology. 2000;164(5):1602–1603. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources