Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;14(2):E42-50.
doi: 10.1111/papr.12143. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

Treatment of neuropathic pain with the capsaicin 8% patch: is pretreatment with lidocaine necessary?

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Treatment of neuropathic pain with the capsaicin 8% patch: is pretreatment with lidocaine necessary?

Kai-Uwe Kern et al. Pain Pract. 2014 Feb.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The capsaicin 8% patch can effectively treat neuropathic pain, but application can cause discomfort or a burning sensation. Until March 2013, it was recommended that patients be pretreated with a topical anesthetic, for example lidocaine, before capsaicin patch application. However, speculation existed over the need for pretreatment and its effectiveness in alleviating treatment-associated discomfort. This article compares tolerability to and efficacy of the capsaicin patch in pretreated and non-pretreated patients. All patients received a single capsaicin patch application. Pretreated patients received a lidocaine plaster before and intravenous lidocaine and metamizole infusions during capsaicin patch application. Pain levels, assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), were used to determine tolerability and efficacy. All patients (pretreated n = 32; non-pretreated n = 26) completed 100% of the intended capsaicin patch application duration. At the time of capsaicin patch removal, 69% of pretreated and 88% of non-pretreated patients reported an NRS score increase, which returned to baseline by 6 hours post-treatment. There was no significant difference in mean NRS score between patient groups at any time during or after capsaicin patch treatment. Response was similar between patient groups; capsaicin patch treatment provided rapid and significant pain reductions that were sustained over 12 weeks. The same proportion of pretreated and non-pretreated patients reported willingness to receive retreatment with the capsaicin patch. This analysis shows that the capsaicin 8% patch is generally tolerable, and the small discomfort associated with patch application is short-lived. Lidocaine pretreatment does not have a significant effect on tolerability, efficacy, or patient willingness to receive retreatment.

Keywords: capsaicin; lidocaine pretreatment; nerve pain; neuralgia; nociceptors; peripheral nervous system; tolerability; topical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in pain score from baseline at removal of capsaicin 8% patch. Data for individual patients receiving lidocaine pretreatment (= 32) and receiving no pretreatment (= 26) are shown, ordered by size of change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score from baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean pain scores (±SD) for pretreated and non-pretreated patients during the first 24 hours after capsaicin 8% patch treatment. P values for pretreated (= 32) vs. non-pretreated (= 26) patients were calculated using a t-test for equality of means, not assuming equal variance, and using the Mann–Whitney U-test that compares ranks and is therefore not affected by the distribution of the dependent variable. P values from the Mann–Whitney U-test are presented in brackets.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in pain score from baseline in pretreated and non-pretreated patients. (A) Change in absolute Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score and (B) percentage change in NRS score from baseline (mean pain score during the week before treatment) is shown. P values for pretreated (= 32) vs. non-pretreated (= 24) patients were calculated using a t-test for equality of means, not assuming equal variance, and using the Mann–Whitney U-test that compares ranks and is therefore not affected by the distribution of the dependent variable. P values from the Mann–Whitney U-test are presented in brackets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion of patients stating that they would be happy to receive capsaicin 8% patch retreatment when necessary. Patients were asked to record if they would be willing to receive capsaicin 8% patch retreatment 90 days after initial treatment. The proportion of pretreated and non-pretreated patients and the proportion of responders, classified as those patients with ≥ 30% decrease in NRS from baseline, and nonresponders willing to receive retreatment are shown.

References

    1. Bouhassira D, Lantéri-Minet M, Attal N, Laurent B, Touboul C. Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population. Pain. 2008;136:380–387. - PubMed
    1. Mailis Gagnon A, Furlan A, Lakha SF, Yegneswaran B. Systematic review of the prevalence of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(Suppl. 1):S202–S203. (Abstract 457)
    1. Torrance N, Smith BH, Bennett MI, Lee AJ. The epidemiology of chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin. Results from a general population survey. J Pain. 2006;7:281–289. - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AB, Dworkin RH. Treatment of neuropathic pain: an overview of recent guidelines. Am J Med. 2009;122(10 Suppl):S22–S32. - PubMed
    1. Stillman M. Clinical approach to patients with neuropathic pain. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73:726–739. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources