Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Mar;15(3):226.e7-226.e13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Is dietetic treatment for undernutrition in older individuals in primary care cost-effective?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Is dietetic treatment for undernutrition in older individuals in primary care cost-effective?

Janneke Schilp et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Undernutrition in older age is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and high health care costs. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a dietetic treatment in primary care compared with usual care in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals.

Design: A parallel randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Primary care.

Participants: A total of 146 undernourished, independently living older (≥65 years) individuals.

Intervention: Dietetic treatment.

Measurements: Main outcomes were change in kilogram body weight compared with baseline and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) after 6 months. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. The main analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data and bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty surrounding cost differences and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated.

Results: The participants were randomized to receive either dietetic treatment (n = 72) or usual care (n = 74). After 6 months, no statistically significant differences were found between the dietetic treatment and usual care group in body weight change (mean difference 0.78 kg, 95% CI -0.26-1.82), QALYs (mean difference 0.001, 95% CI -0.04-0.04) and total costs (mean difference €1645, 95% CI -525-3547). The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) for QALYs was not interpretable. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for body weight gain was 2111. The probability that dietetic treatment is cost-effective compared with usual care was 0.78 for a ceiling ratio of €5000 for body weight and 0.06 for a ceiling ratio of €20.000 for QALY.

Conclusion: In this study, dietetic treatment in older, undernourished, community-dwelling individuals was not cost-effective compared with usual care.

Keywords: Undernutrition; cost-effectiveness; dietetic treatment; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources