Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Apr;95(4):753-769.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Giné-Garriga  1 , Marta Roqué-Fíguls  2 , Laura Coll-Planas  3 , Mercè Sitjà-Rabert  4 , Antoni Salvà  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Giné-Garriga et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):211-212. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.001. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29289297 No abstract available.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy of exercise-based interventions on improving performance-based measures of physical function and markers of physical frailty in community-dwelling, frail older people.

Data sources: Comprehensive bibliographic searches in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PEDro, and CINAHL databases were conducted (April 2013).

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials of community-dwelling older adults, defined as frail according to physical function and physical difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL). Included trials had to compare an exercise intervention with a control or another exercise intervention, and assess performance-based measures of physical function such as mobility and gait, or disability in ADL.

Data extraction: Two review authors independently screened the search results and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Nineteen trials were included, 12 of them comparing exercise with an inactive control. Most exercise programs were multicomponent.

Data synthesis: Meta-analysis was performed for the comparison of exercise versus control with the inverse variance method under the random-effects models. When compared with control interventions, exercise was shown to improve normal gait speed (mean difference [MD]=.07m/s; 95% confidence interval [CI], .04-.09), fast gait speed (MD=.08m/s; 95% CI, .02-.14), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (MD=2.18; 95% CI, 1.56-2.80). Results are inconclusive for endurance outcomes, and no consistent effect was observed on balance and the ADL functional mobility. The evidence comparing different modalities of exercise is scarce and heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Exercise has some benefits in frail older people, although uncertainty still exists with regard to which exercise characteristics (type, frequency, duration) are most effective.

Keywords: Exercise; Frail elderly; Meta-analysis; Rehabilitation; Review, systematic.

PubMed Disclaimer