Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy
- PMID: 24293178
- DOI: 10.1007/s10840-013-9849-8
Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Abstract
Aim: Recent studies have shown that a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead can result in low rates of dislocation and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) acutely and on medium-term follow-up in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We evaluated the outcomes of CRT patients in whom a quadripolar LV lead was implanted in our institution.
Methods: We studied 45 consecutive heart failure patients (75 % men; age, 70.3 ± 9.0 years) following successful implantation of a quadripolar LV lead. Demographic and clinical data were collected preoperatively, and patients were followed up for 18.9 months.
Results: The implantation success rate was 100 %. Mean overall duration was 100.1 ± 34.6 min, and X-ray exposure time was 13.20 ± 13.5 min. The most distal effective pacing site was used as the final pacing configuration in all patients. Acute dislodgment requiring reoperation occurred before discharge in three cases (6.6 %). Six patients (13 %) suffered PNS during follow-up; we solved this problem by changing the stimulation vector. Three months after implantation, a mean of six out of ten effective sites (threshold <2.5 V at 1.5 ms, no PNS) per patient was recorded.
Conclusions: Over the relatively long term, the quadripolar LV lead was associated with excellent pacing thresholds and low rates of dislocation and PNS.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Jul 25. Heart Rhythm. 2012. PMID: 22841876
-
Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;38(8):942-50. doi: 10.1111/pace.12664. Epub 2015 Jun 12. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25974406
-
Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.019. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Heart Rhythm. 2015. PMID: 25533587 Clinical Trial.
-
Bipolar versus quadripolar left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: evidence to date.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Dec;19(12):1075-1084. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.2013813. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021. PMID: 34865590 Review.
-
A comparison of the different features of quadripolar left ventricular pacing leads to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Sep;14(9):697-706. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1369404. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017. PMID: 28835138 Review.
Cited by
-
Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;41(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9917-8. Epub 2014 Jun 17. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24934757 Review.
-
Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Apr 30;7(6):1202. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1202. eCollection 2015 Apr-May. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015. PMID: 27957161 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Loop Technique in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 26;17:3711-3717. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S482227. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39219670 Free PMC article.
-
Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;42(1):59-66. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9956-1. Epub 2014 Dec 13. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25504267 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):927-934. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9737-5. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 30209643
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials