Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(4):10.1080/1556035X.2013.836867.
doi: 10.1080/1556035X.2013.836867.

Group Process in the single-gender Women's Recovery Group compared with mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling

Shelly F Greenfield  1 , Laura E Kuper, Amanda M Cummings, Michael S Robbins, Robert J Gallop
Affiliations

Group Process in the single-gender Women's Recovery Group compared with mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling

Shelly F Greenfield et al. J Groups Addict Recover. 2013.

Abstract

Enhanced affiliation among members is thought to provide increased support for women in single-gender compared with mixed-gender group therapy for substance use disorders (SUDs) and to provide a potential mechanism of action for its efficacy. In a Stage I trial of single-gender versus mixed-gender group therapy for SUDs we examined affiliative statements made by members in two group treatments, single-gender Women's Recovery Group (WRG) and mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling (GDC). Twenty-eight WRG and 17 GDC group therapy tapes were coded and compared for five types of affiliative statements. Three types of affiliative statements (agreement, supportive, and completing a thought) were highly correlated and were more frequent in WRG than GDC (D=0.882, p=0.27). In GDC, women were more likely to provide an affiliative statement to a male group member than any other combination of directionality (p<0.01). Compared with mixed-gender, single-gender group therapy for SUDs may enhance support through greater frequency of affiliative statements.

Keywords: Group Therapy; Mixed-gender programs; Treatment for women; Treatment outcomes; Women-only programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Directionality rates for the Individual Scales among GDC group participants: Average across sessions
Figure 2
Figure 2
Directional Rates for the Composite Affiliative Scale among GDC group participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bakali JV, Wilberg T, Hagtvet KA, Lorentzen S. Sources accounting for alliance and cohesion at three stages in group psychotherapy: Variance component analyses. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2010;14(4):368–383.
    1. Bliese PD, Halverson RR. Individual and nomothetic models of job stress: An examination of work hours, cohesion, and well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1996;26(13):1171–1189.
    1. Brook DW, Galanter M, Kleber HD. Group therapy. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD, editors. The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment. 4th ed. Arlington, VA US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2008. pp. 413–427.
    1. Brown A, Mistry T. Group work with 'mixed membership' groups: Issues of race and gender. Social Work with Groups: A Journal of Community and Clinical Practice. 1994;17(3):5–21.
    1. Budman SH, Soldz S, Demby A, Feldstein M. Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. 1989;52(3):339–350. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources