Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;5(6):305-14.
doi: 10.1177/1759720X13502919.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: how to diagnose a rare but highly fatal disease

Affiliations
Review

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: how to diagnose a rare but highly fatal disease

Cassyanne L Aguiar et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a multisystem autoimmune condition characterized by vascular thromboses and/or pregnancy loss associated with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is the most severe form of APS with multiple organ involvement developing over a short period of time, usually associated with microthrombosis. 'Definite' and 'probable' CAPS have been defined based on the preliminary classification criteria; however, in a real-world setting, aPL-positive patients with multiple organ thromboses and/or thrombotic microangiopathies exist who do not fulfill these criteria. Previous APS diagnosis and/or persistent clinically significant aPL positivity is of great importance for the CAPS diagnosis; however, almost half of the patients who develop CAPS do not have a history of aPL positivity. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the diagnostic challenges and the recently updated diagnostic algorithms for CAPS providing a 'step-by-step' approach for clinicians (and researchers) in the assessment of patients with multiple organ thromboses.

Keywords: anti-β2-glycoprotein-1 antibody; anticardiolipin antibody; antiphospholipid syndrome; catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome; lupus anticoagulant; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Algorithm A.
Algorithm A.
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) diagnosis in patients with history of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or persistent antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity [Erkan et al. 2010]. Reprinted from [Erkan et al. 2010] with permissions from Elsevier. *Our recommendation for the definition of ‘positive aPL’ is: lupus anticoagulant (LA) test positive based on the guidelines of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Pengo et al. 2009]; anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgG/M ≥40 U, and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibody (aβ2GPI) IgG/M ≥40 U. Caution and further assessment(s) are required if: (a) LA test is performed in anticoagulated patients; (b) aCL or aβ2GPI IgG/M titers are in the range of 20–39 U; and/or (c) aCL or aβ2GPI IgA is the only positive aPL enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test.
Algorithm B.
Algorithm B.
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) diagnosis in patients without history of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or persistent antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity [Erkan et al. 2010]. Reprinted from [Erkan et al. 2010] with permissions from Elsevier. *Our recommendation for the definition of ‘positive aPL’ is: lupus anticoagulant (LA) test positive based on the guidelines of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Pengo et al. 2009]; anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgG/M ≥40 U, and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibody (aβ2GPI) IgG/M ≥40 U. Caution and further assessment(s) are required if: (a) LA test is performed in anticoagulated patients; (b) aCL or aβ2GPI IgG/M titers are in the range of 20–39 U; and/or (c) aCL or aβ2GPI IgA is the only positive aPL enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. **‘Positive aPL’ twice 12 weeks apart (of note, the original Sapporo APS classification criteria required two positive aPL tests 6 weeks apart [Wilson et al. 1999], which has been changed to 12 weeks as part of the updated Sapporo APS classification criteria [Miyakis et al. 2006].
Algorithm C.
Algorithm C.
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) diagnosis in patients without history of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or persistent antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity [Erkan et al. 2010]. Reprinted from [Erkan et al. 2010] with permissions from Elsevier. *Our recommendation for the definition of ‘positive aPL’ is: lupus anticoagulant (LA) test positive based on the guidelines of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Pengo et al. 2009]; anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgG/M ≥40 U, and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibody (aβ2GPI) IgG/M ≥40 U. Caution and further assessment(s) are required if: (a) LA test is performed in anticoagulated patients; (b) aCL or aβ2GPI IgG/M titers are in the range of 20–39 U; and/or (c) aCL or aβ2GPI IgA is the only positive aPL enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. **‘Positive aPL’ twice 12 weeks apart (of note, the original Sapporo APS classification criteria required two positive aPL tests 6 weeks apart [Wilson et al. 1999], which has been changed to 12 weeks as part of the updated Sapporo APS classification criteria [Miyakis et al. 2006].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpert D., Mandl L., Erkan D., Yin W., Peerschke E., Salmon J. (2008) Anti-heparin platelet factor 4 antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with IgM antiphospholipid antibodies and the antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 395–401 - PubMed
    1. Asherson R. (2006) New subsets of the antiphospholipid syndrome in 2006: “PRE-APS” (probable APS) and microangiopathic antiphospholipid syndromes (“MAPS”). Autoimmun Rev 6: 76–80 - PubMed
    1. Asherson R., Cervera R. (2008) Microvascular and microangiopathic antiphospholipid-associated syndromes (“MAPS”) semantic or antisemantic? Autoimmun Rev 7: 164–167 - PubMed
    1. Asherson R., Cervera R., de Groot P., Erkan D., Boffa M., Piette J., et al. (2003) Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: international consensus statement on classification criteria and treatment guidelines. Lupus 12: 530–534 - PubMed
    1. Asherson R., Pierangeli S., Cervera R. (2007) Microangiopathic antiphospholipid associated syndromes revisited new concepts relating to antiphospholipid antibodies and syndromes. J Rheumatol 34: 1793–1795 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources