A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel-titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment
- PMID: 24297959
- PMCID: PMC4078986
- DOI: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000072
A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel-titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment
Abstract
Objective: To investigate and compare the effects of superelastic nickel-titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires on pain during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment.
Design: A double-blind two-arm parallel design stratified randomized clinical trial.
Setting: A single centre in India between December 2010 and June 2012. A total of 96 participants (48 male and 48 females; 14.1±2.1 years old) were randomized (stratified on age, sex and initial crowding) to superelastic nickel-titanium or multistranded stainless steel archwire groups using a computer-generated allocation sequence.
Methods: We compared 0.016-inch superelastic nickel-titanium and 0.0175-inch multistranded stainless steel wires in 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) preadjusted edgewise appliances. The follow-up period was 14 days. Outcome was assessed with a visual analogue scale at baseline and 32 pre-specified follow-up points. Data was analyzed using mixed-effects model analysis.
Results: One participant was lost to follow up and 10 were excluded from the analysis due to bond failure or incomplete questionnaire answers. Ultimately, 85 participants (42 males and 43 females; 14.1±2.0 years old) were analysed for the final results. No statistically significant difference was found for overall pain [F value = 2.65, degrees of freedom (df) = 92.6; P = 0.1071]. However, compared to multistranded stainless steel wires, pain in subjects with superelastic nickel-titanium archwires was significantly greater at 12 h (t = 2.34; P = 0.0193), as well as at day 1 in the morning (t = 2.21, P = 0.0273), afternoon (t = 2.11, P = 0.0346) and at bedtime (t = 2.03, P = 0.042).
Conclusion: For overall pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two wires. However, subjects with superelastic nickel-titanium archwires had a significantly higher pain at peak level.
Keywords: Orthodontic pain; alignment; initial archwires.
Figures
References
-
- Giannopoulou C, Dudic A, Kiliaridis S. Pain discomfort and crevicular fluid changes induced by orthodontic elastic separators in children. J Pain. 2006;7:367–76. - PubMed
-
- Reitan K. Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1957;43:32–45.
-
- Weinstein S. Minimum forces in tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:881–903. - PubMed
-
- Storey E, Smith R. Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement. Aust J Dent. 1952;56:11–18.
-
- Gianelly A A, Goldman H M, (eds.). Tooth Movement. Biological Basis of Orthodontics. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1971, 116–204.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous