Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Mar;32(3):635-43.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000051.

Predictors and outcomes of resistant hypertension among patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Predictors and outcomes of resistant hypertension among patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension

Steven M Smith et al. J Hypertens. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Resistant hypertension (res-HTN) is a challenging problem, but little is known of res-HTN in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In this post-hoc INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST) analysis, we assessed prevalence, predictors, and impact on outcomes of res-HTN in CAD patients with hypertension.

Methods: Participants (n=17190) were divided into three groups according to achieved blood pressure (BP): controlled (BP <140/90 mmHg on three or fewer drugs); uncontrolled (BP ≥ 40/90 mmHg on two or fewer drugs); or resistant (BP ≥ 40/90 mmHg on three drugs or any patient on at least four drugs).

Results: The prevalence of res-HTN was 38%: significant predictors of res-HTN included heart failure [odds ratio (OR) 1.73], diabetes (OR 1.63), Black race (OR 1.50), and US residence (OR 1.50). Compared with controlled HTN, res-HTN had multivariate-adjusted association with higher risk of adverse outcomes {first occurrence of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke [hazard ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.43], and individual outcomes of all-cause death (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13-1.48), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.21-1.78), and nonfatal stroke (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.22), but not nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.72-1.34)}. Adverse outcomes, except nonfatal stroke, did not differ in patients with res-HTN compared to uncontrolled HTN.

Conclusions: Res-HTN is common in patients with CAD and hypertension, associated with poor prognosis, and linked with a number of conditions. Emphasis should be placed on recognizing those at risk for res-HTN and future studies should examine whether more aggressive treatment of res-HTN improves outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of participants included in this study. Controlled HTN indicates BP below 140/90 mmHg on three or fewer antihypertensive drugs. Res-HTN indicates BP at least 140/90 mmHg on at least three antihypertensive drugs (uncontrolled res-HTN) or BP below 140/90 on at least four antihypertensive drugs (controlled res-HTN). Uncontrolled HTN indicates BP at least 140/90 mmHg on two or fewer antihypertensive drugs. BP, blood pressure; ITT, intention to treat; res-HTN, resistant hypertension.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean SBP (top panel) and DBP (bottom panel) according to hypertension control group and study follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients according to total (study + nonstudy) number of antihypertensive drugs and hypertension control group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Baseline predictors of increased risk for resistant hypertension. BB, β-blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; DM, diabetes mellitus; LVH, left-ventricular hypertrophy; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; TIA, transient ischemic attack; Tx, treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Prevalence of resistant hypertension according to total number of risk factors present. Risk factors represent those identified as independent baseline predictors of risk for resistant hypertension in multivariate logistic regression analyses and include presence of heart failure, diabetes, Black race, US residence, renal insufficiency, stroke/TIA, left-ventricular hypertrophy, peripheral artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, age, BMI, female sex, and treatment with β-blocker strategy. res-HTN, resistant hypertension; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Rates and adjusted risk for composite and individual adverse outcomes risk according to hypertension control group. Composite outcome represents first occurrence of all-cause mortality, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal MI. MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cumulative event rate for the primary outcome according to hypertension control group.

Comment in

References

    1. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–1419. - PubMed
    1. Cushman WC, Ford CE, Cutler JA, Margolis KL, Davis BR, Grimm RH, et al. Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse north american settings: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2002;4:393–404. - PubMed
    1. Gupta AK, Nasothimiou EG, Chang CL, Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR ASCOT Investigators. Baseline predictors of resistant hypertension in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial (ASCOT): a risk score to identify those at high-risk. J Hypertens. 2011;29:2004–2013. - PubMed
    1. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN, Brzezinski WA, Ferdinand KC. Uncontrolled and apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States, 1988 to 2008. Circulation. 2011;124:1046–1058. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith SM. Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of resistant hypertension. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:1071–1086. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances