Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar;25(2):138-44.
doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000062.

Q wave area for stratification of global left ventricular infarct size: comparison to conventional ECG assessment using Selvester QRS-score

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Q wave area for stratification of global left ventricular infarct size: comparison to conventional ECG assessment using Selvester QRS-score

Jonathan W Weinsaft et al. Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Left ventricular (LV) infarct size is a prognostic determinant after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). ECG data have been used to measure infarct size, but conventional approaches use multiparametric algorithms that have limited clinical applicability. This study tested a novel ECG approach - based solely on Q wave area - for calculation of LV infarct size.

Methods: Serial 12-lead ECGs were performed in AMI patients. Computerized software was used to quantify Q wave area (summed across surface ECG leads) and Selvester QRS-score components. ECG analysis was compared to the reference of myocardial infarct size quantified by delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance.

Results: Overall, 158 patients underwent ECG during early (4±0.4) and follow-up (29±5 days) post-AMI time points. Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area increased stepwise with LV infarct size (P<0.001). Whereas both methods manifested marked increases at a threshold of 10% LV infarction, magnitude was greater for Q wave area (>2.5-fold) than Selvester QRS-score (<two-fold). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, Q wave area (area under the curve=0.83-0.86) and Selvester QRS-score (0.82-0.87) manifested similar performance in relation to a 10% infarct cutoff. When Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area thresholds were selected to optimize sensitivity, both methods yielded similar negative predictive value (Q wave area: 89-91%, Selvester QRS-score: 92-94%) although specificity was higher for Q wave area (44-45 vs. 17-25%; P≤0.01).

Conclusion: Q wave area provides an index for stratification of LV infarct size that performs similarly to conventional ECG assessment via the Selvester QRS-score for exclusion of large infarction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00539045.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selvester QRS-score (left) and Q wave area (right) (mean ± standard deviation), as measured on follow-up ECG, in relation to DE-CMR evidenced infarct size. Note marked increase in both Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area among patients with infarct size ≥ 10% LV myocardium (grey bars).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots relating DE-CMR quantified infarct size (y-axis) to ECG quantified Selvester QRS-score (2A-B) and Q wave area (2C-D) (x-axes). Correlation coefficients and corresponding linear regression lines for each respective scatter plot are shown for subgroups of patients with infarct size ≥ (grey) and < 10% (black) LV myocardium.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic performance of Selvester QRS-score (red) and Q wave area (blue), as measured on early (left) and follow-up (right) ECG in relation to a cutoff of infarct size ≥ 10% LV myocardium.

References

    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD. on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1581–1598. - PubMed
    1. Loring Z, Chelliah S, Selvester RH, Wagner G, Strauss DG. A detailed guide for quantification of myocardial scar with the selvester qrs score in the presence of electrocardiogram confounders. J Electrocardiol. 2011;44:544–554. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Hindman NB. The selvester qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. The development and application of the system. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:1877–1881. - PubMed
    1. Bang LE, Ripa RS, Grande P, Kastrup J, Clemmensen PM, Wagner GS. Comparison of infarct size changes with delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiogram qrs scoring during the 6 months after acutely reperfused myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2008;41:609–613. - PubMed
    1. Carlsen EA, Bang LE, Ahtarovski KA, Engstrom T, Kober L, Kelbaek H, et al. Comparison of selvester qrs score with magnetic resonance imaging measured infarct size in patients with st elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45:414–419. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data