Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;10(4):e215-22.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001067. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care

Affiliations
Review

Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care

Roxanne E Jensen et al. J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (PRO) systems is increasing in cancer clinical care settings. This review comprehensively identifies existing PRO systems and explores how systems differ in the administration of PRO assessments, the integration of information into the clinic workflow and electronic health record (EHR) systems, and the reporting of PRO information.

Methods: Electronic PRO (e-PRO) systems were identified through a semistructured review of published studies, gray literature, and expert identification. System developers were contacted to provide detailed e-PRO system characteristics and clinical implementation information using a structured review form.

Results: A total of 33 unique systems implemented in cancer clinical practice were identified. Of these, 81% provided detailed information about system characteristics. Two system classifications were established: treatment-centered systems designed for patient monitoring during active cancer treatment (n = 8) and patient-centered systems following patients across treatment and survivorship periods (n = 19). There was little consensus on administration, integration, or result reporting between these system types. Patient-centered systems were more likely to provide user-friendly features such as at-home assessments, integration into larger electronic system networks (eg, EHRs), and more robust score reporting options. Well-established systems were more likely to have features that increased assessment flexibility (eg, location, automated reminders) and better clinical integration.

Conclusion: The number of e-PRO systems has increased. Systems can be programmed to have numerous features that facilitate integration of PRO assessment and routine monitoring into clinical care. Important barriers to system usability and widespread adoption include assessment flexibility, clinical integration, and high-quality data collection and reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, et al. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;79:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Zickuhr K, Smith A. Digital differences. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences/Overview/Digital....
    1. Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Improving modern cancer care through information technology. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(suppl 2):S198–S207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, et al. Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: Relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1624–1632. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hilarius DL, Kloeg PH, Gundy CM, et al. Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: A community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer. 2008;113:628–637. - PubMed

Publication types