Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 3;3(12):e004025.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004025.

Primary prevention of diabetic retinopathy with fibrates: a retrospective, matched cohort study

Affiliations

Primary prevention of diabetic retinopathy with fibrates: a retrospective, matched cohort study

Christopher Ll Morgan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in people with type 2 diabetes treated with fibrates with that of non-exposed controls.

Design: Retrospective, matched cohort study.

Setting: UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Participants: 5038 people with type 2 diabetes with a history of fibrate exposure but without evidence of DR were identified. Three thousand one hundred and seventy-six (63%) people could be randomly matched to one non-exposed control; of these, 2599 (81.8%) were matched without any missing blood pressure or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values.

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was first recorded DR with a secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality or first DR. Time to clinical endpoints was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Mean follow-up was 5.1 and 5.0 years for fibrate-exposed and non-exposed patients, respectively. For fibrate-exposed participants, there was a reduction in DR: 33.4 events/1000 person-years vs 40.4 (p=0.002), and in death or DR: 50.6 vs 60.2 (p<0.001). For those matched with full systolic blood pressure and HbA1c data, crude event rates were 34.3 versus 43.9 for DR (p<0.001) and 51.2 vs 63.4 (p<0.001) for death or DR. Following adjustment, DR was significantly delayed for those treated with fibrates, with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.785 (p<0.001) for participants with complete data and an aHR of 0.802 (p<0.001) for all participants.

Conclusions: The treatment with fibrates in people with type 2 diabetes was independently associated with reduced progression to a first diagnosis of DR.

Keywords: Diabetes & Endocrinology; Fibrate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time to discontinuation of fibrate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier (unadjusted) curves for time to clinical endpoints.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and progression to diabetic retinopathy*.

References

    1. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2012;35:556–64 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Gulliford MC, et al. Ethnic variation in the prevalence of visual impairment in people attending diabetic retinopathy screening in the United Kingdom (DRIVE UK). PLoS ONE 2012;7:e39608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohner E, Allwinkle J, Andrews J, et al. Saint Vincent and improving diabetes care: report of the Visual Handicap Group. Diabet Med 1996;13(Suppl 4):S13–26 - PubMed
    1. Bunce C, Wormald R. Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England & Wales. BMC Public Health 2006;6:58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scanlon PH. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen 2008;15:1–4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources