Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;109(5):736-45.
doi: 10.1111/add.12438. Epub 2014 Jan 19.

Testing a social ecological model of alcohol use: the California 50-city study

Affiliations

Testing a social ecological model of alcohol use: the California 50-city study

Paul J Gruenewald et al. Addiction. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background and aims: Social ecological theories suggest that greater community alcohol availability and individual drinker characteristics should jointly affect drinking patterns and the use of drinking contexts. We assessed relationships of demographic and personality characteristics of individual drinkers and environmental characteristics at the city-level to measures of drinking patterns and use of drinking contexts.

Design: Multi-level statistical analyses of archival and survey data from 50 cities in California, USA.

Settings: An ecological sample of 50 geographically distinct cities with populations from 50 000 to 500 000 people.

Participants: General population telephone survey of 8553 adults 18 years of age and older stratified by cities.

Measurements: Archival data on city-level alcohol outlet densities were combined with individual survey data identifying community conditions, individual demographic and psychosocial characteristics, frequencies of use of drinking contexts and drinking patterns.

Findings: Greater on-premise outlet densities were related to greater drinking frequencies (b = 2.9671, z = 4.688, P < 0.001) and volumes (b = 0.6274, z = 3.394, P < 0.001) and use of on-premises drinking places (bars, b = 0.3340, z = 2.645, P < 0.006 and restaurants, b = 0.1712, z = 2.770, P = 0.005). Individual demographic and personality characteristics were related to drinking and use of drinking contexts. For example, greater impulsivity was related to greater drinking frequencies (b = 0.2001, z = 2.088, P = 0.023) and logged quantities (b = 0.0151, z = 2.009, P = 0.026) and proportionately more drinking at bars (b = 0.0332, z = 2.016, P = 0.026) and parties (b = 0.1712, z = 2.770, P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Community availability of alcohol and individual drinker characteristics appear to act jointly to affect drinking levels and use of drinking contexts. These effects may increase risks related to drinking in some contexts (e.g. bars) much more than others (e.g. at friends' or relatives' homes).

Keywords: Alcohol outlets; alcohol use; assortative drinking; context selection; drinking contexts; risky drinking contexts; social ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual relationships between community-level and individual-level correlates of drinking patterns and use of drinking contexts

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gruenewald PJ. The spatial ecology of alcohol problems: Niche theory and assortative drinking. Addiction. 2007 Jun;102(6):870–878. - PubMed
    1. Aoyama Y, Murphy JG, Hanson S. Key Concepts in Economic Geography. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011.
    1. Ponicki WR, Gruenewald PJ, Remer LG, Martin SE, Treno AJ. Assessing the validity of on-premise license data in six communities in California: Operating characteristics and outlet densities. Substance Use and Misuse, in Review. 2012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holder HD. Alcohol and the Community: A Systems Approach to Prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
    1. O’Sullivan A. Urban Economics. 6th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2007.

Publication types