Tilting at windmills: a comment on Auer and Griffiths
- PMID: 24306182
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9428-z
Tilting at windmills: a comment on Auer and Griffiths
Abstract
In their review of Internet gambling studies, Auer and Griffiths (Soc Sci Comput Rev 20(3):312-320, 2013) question the validity of using bet size as an indicator of gambling intensity. Instead, Auer and Griffiths suggest using "theoretical loss" as a preferable measure of gambling intensity. This comment identifies problems with their argument and suggests a convergent rather than an exclusionary approach to Internet gambling measures and analysis.
Comment in
-
Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity (Revisited): A Response to Braverman et al. (2013).J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):921-31. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9463-4. J Gambl Stud. 2015. PMID: 24760196
Comment on
-
An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity.J Gambl Stud. 2014 Dec;30(4):879-87. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7. J Gambl Stud. 2014. PMID: 23508851
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
