Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;27(5):397-405.
doi: 10.1007/s10334-013-0421-4. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Initial clinical application of modified Dixon with flexible echo times: hepatic and pancreatic fat assessments in comparison with (1)H MRS

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Initial clinical application of modified Dixon with flexible echo times: hepatic and pancreatic fat assessments in comparison with (1)H MRS

Roshan S Livingstone et al. MAGMA. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Objects: Hepatic and pancreatic fat content become increasingly important for phenotyping of individuals with metabolic diseases. This study aimed to (1) evaluate hepatic fat fractions (HFF) and pancreatic fat fractions (PFF) using (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and the recently introduced fast mDixon method, and to examine body fat effects on HFF and PFF, (2) investigate regional differences in HFF and PFF by mDixon.

Materials and methods: HFF and PFF were quantified by mDixon with two flexible echo times and by single voxel (1)H MRS in 24 healthy subjects. The regional differences of PFF within the pancreas were assessed with mDixon. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat was assessed by T1-weighted MRI at 3T.

Results: Both methods correlated well for quantification of HFF (r = 0.98, p < 0.0001) and PFF (r = 0.80, p < 0.0001). However, mDixon showed a higher low limit in HFF and PFF. PFF showed no regional differences using mDixon. In addition, both visceral and subcutaneous fat correlated with pancreatic fat, while only visceral fat correlated with liver fat, employing both (1)H MRS and mDixon.

Conclusion: The novel and fast two-point mDixon exhibits a good correlation with the gold-standard (1)H MRS for assessment of HFF and PFF, with limited sensitivity for assessing lower fat content.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jan;51(1):35-45 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr;65(4):994-1004 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 2004 Aug;52(2):415-9 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr 28;16(16):1993-8 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):485-90 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources