Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research
- PMID: 24307509
- PMCID: PMC4059848
- DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0175-8
Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research
Abstract
Use of electronic medical records (EMR) and residual clinical biospecimens have become important for the conduct of biomedical research. Currently, human subjects' protection regulations permit much of this research to be conducted without individual informed consent, posing a risk to biomedical research from public objection. We sought to understand public attitudes regarding access to EMRs and residual clinical biospecimens. This article reports the results of 12 focus groups with 131 participants conducted in Utah, Washington, Arizona, and Minnesota. Results indicate strong support for biomedical and genetic research in general and clear support for improved patient education regarding research access to individual data and biospecimens. Our participants were supportive of an opt-out approach to patient decision-making regarding research access to clinical data and biospecimens for research in general.
References
-
- Kaufman D, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, Scott J. Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients. Genet Med. 2012 - PubMed
-
- Mason J. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2002.
-
- Miles M, Huberman MM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
