Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 4;9(6):20130838.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0838. Print 2013.

Rates of transposition in Escherichia coli

Affiliations

Rates of transposition in Escherichia coli

Ana Sousa et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

The evolutionary role of transposable elements (TEs) is still highly controversial. Two key parameters, the transposition rate (u and w, for replicative and non-replicative transposition) and the excision rate (e) are fundamental to understanding their evolution and maintenance in populations. We have estimated u, w and e for six families of TEs (including eight members: IS1, IS2, IS3, IS4, IS5, IS30, IS150 and IS186) in Escherichia coli, using a mutation accumulation (MA) experiment. In this experiment, mutations accumulate essentially at the rate at which they appear, during a period of 80 500 (1610 generations × 50 lines) generations, and spontaneous transposition events can be detected. This differs from other experiments in which insertions accumulated under strong selective pressure or over a limited genomic target. We therefore provide new estimates for the spontaneous rates of transposition and excision in E. coli. We observed 25 transposition and three excision events in 50 MA lines, leading to overall rate estimates of u ∼ 1.15 × 10(-5), w ∼ 4 × 10(-8) and e ∼ 1.08 × 10(-6) (per element, per generation). Furthermore, extensive variation between elements was found, consistent with previous knowledge of the mechanisms and regulation of transposition for the different elements.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; insertion sequences; mutation accumulation; rate of transposition; transposable elements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of transposition events as a function of initial copy number (for a given IS element). The regression equation is y = 0.83x – 0.67, r2 = 0.30, p = 0.04.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Estimates of transposition rates per element, per generation. Standard deviations are given between brackets. These estimates are based on data reported in table 1. See §2 for details of the analysis. Black and grey dots represent u and w, respectively. Open circles represent rates of excision. n.d. means non determined. Please note that the minimum estimate of u for IS186 and e for IS30 cover zero, therefore these cannot be represented in a logarithmic scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mahillon J, Chandler M. 1998. Insertion sequences. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 725–774 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parkhill J, et al. 2003. Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Nat. Genet. 35, 32–40 (doi:10.1038/ng1227) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartl DL, Dykhuizen DE, Miller RD, Green L, de Framond J. 1983. Transposable element IS50 improves growth rate of E. coli cells without transposition. Cell 35, 503–510 (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90184-8) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casacuberta E, González J. 2013. The impact of transposable elements in environmental adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 22, 1503–1517 (doi:10.1111/mec.12170) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elena SF, Ekunwe L, Hajela N, Oden SA, Lenski RE. 1998. Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetica 102–103, 349–358 (doi:10.1023/A:1017031008316) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources