Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Nov 28;19(44):8078-84.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.8078.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer in Eastern China

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer in Eastern China

Jian-Fei Fu et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To explore the clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with colorectal cancer patients in Eastern China.

Methods: A total of 1335 patients with colorectal cancer treated from December 1985 to December 2005 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were studied retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, a younger group (aged ≤ 30 years) and an older group (aged > 30 years), and comparison was made in the clinical characteristics and prognosis between the two groups. Chi-square test was used for data analysis of all categorical variables, and overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox model.

Results: There were 42 (3.1%) and 1293 (96.9%) cases in the younger group and older group, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the 5- and 10-year OS in the younger group were 33.9% and 26.1%, respectively, and those in the older group were 60.1% and 52.2%, respectively. Younger group had poor survival (χ(2) = 14.146, P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis revealed that age was not a dependent factor for prognosis (OR = 0.866, 95%CI: 0.592-1.269, P = 0.461). Stratified analysis indicated that in stage III and IV disease, the 5- and 10-year OS were 24.6% and 14.8% in the younger group, and 40.4% and 33.3% in the older group, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (χ(2) = 5.101, P = 0.024). In the subgroup of radical surgery, the 5- and 10-year OS were 44.3% and 34.2% in the younger group, and 69.6% and 60.5% in the older group, with a difference being significant between the two groups (χ(2) = 7.830, P = 0.005).

Conclusion: Compared with older patients, the younger patients have lower survival, especially in the subgroups of stage III and IV disease and radical surgery.

Keywords: Clinicopathologic feature; Colorectal cancer; Prognosis; Radical surgery; Young.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival of patients in the younger group (≤ 30 years) and older group (> 30 years). The younger group had worse prognosis than the older group (P = 0.000).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival of younger patients (≤ 30 years) and older patients (> 30 years) in stage I and II tumor subgroup. A: Overall survival was totally similar between the two groups (P = 0.899); B: Cancer-related survival was similar between the two groups (P = 0.551).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival of younger patients (≤ 30 years) and older patients (> 30 years) in stage III and IV tumor subgroup. The younger group had worse prognosis than the older group (P = 0.024).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival of younger patients (≤ 30 years) and older patients (> 30 years) based on approach of surgery. A: The younger group had worse prognosis than the older group (P = 0.005) undergoing radical surgery; B: There was no difference between the two groups (P = 0.737) treated by non-radical surgery.

References

    1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, Jemal A, Schymura MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Seeff LC, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. You YN, Xing Y, Feig BW, Chang GJ, Cormier JN. Young-onset colorectal cancer: is it time to pay attention? Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:287–289. - PubMed
    1. Neufeld D, Shpitz B, Bugaev N, Grankin M, Bernheim J, Klein E, Ziv Y. Young-age onset of colorectal cancer in Israel. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:201–204. - PubMed
    1. McMillan DC, McArdle CS. The impact of young age on cancer-specific and non-cancer-related survival after surgery for colorectal cancer: 10-year follow-up. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:557–560. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu QJ, Vogtmann E, Zhang W, Xie L, Yang WS, Tan YT, Gao J, Xiang YB. Cancer incidence among adolescents and young adults in urban Shanghai, 1973-2005. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42607. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms