[Ultrasound screening and diagnostic ultrasound: should we revise the classification of examinations?]
- PMID: 24309030
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.08.011
[Ultrasound screening and diagnostic ultrasound: should we revise the classification of examinations?]
Keywords: Diagnostic ultrasound; Dépistage échographique; Grossesse à bas risque; Grossesse à haut risque; High-risk pregnancy; Low-risk pregnancy; Non-morphological ultrasound; Ultrasound screening; Échographie diagnostique; Échographie non morphologique.
Similar articles
-
[How many ultrasound examinations for low-risk pregnancies monitoring?].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Jan;42(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014. PMID: 24394326 French.
-
Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1129-35. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181b58fbf. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19786915
-
[Fusion imaging, a modern symbol of collaboration between obstetricians and radiologists].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 May;42(5):293-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 29. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014. PMID: 24787609 French. No abstract available.
-
[Report of the French "conférence nationale de l'échographie obstétricale et fœtale" (CNEOF)-- recommendations for focused prenatal ultrasound].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015 Jun;43(6):469-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 14. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015. PMID: 25982782 French.
-
Doppler ultrasound in obstetric practice: 2.Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Jan 19-Feb 1;51(1-2):34-9. Br J Hosp Med. 1994. PMID: 8826041 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources