Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Feb;89(2):139-41.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

The IUB, a newly invented IUD: a brief report

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The IUB, a newly invented IUD: a brief report

Ilan Baram et al. Contraception. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the initial safety and effectiveness of the intrauterine ball (IUB), a copper intrauterine device that, upon insertion in the uterus, takes a three-dimensional spherical form.

Study design: Fifteen women were followed for 1 year, with follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Results: The physician reported that all devices were very easy to insert. One subject discontinued before the 6-month visit (at 119 days after insertion) for a reason not related to the device. There were no perforations, expulsions, malpositions or complications, or pregnancies.

Conclusion: No safety or efficacy concerns were raised.

Implications: Due to its form and deployment process the IUB is expected to ease insertion and reduce perforation, malposition and expulsion rates and may also reduce dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01590563.

Keywords: Discontinuation; Ease of insertion; Efficacy; Expulsion; Safety; Satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The IUB™
Figure 2
Figure 2. The IUB™ in its free form (Left), and loaded into the insertion tube (right)

References

    1. Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception. 2003;67:53–6. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data