Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;5(4):264-8.
doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.120303.

The effect of a 6 Fr catheter on flow rate in men

Patrick Richard  1 , Nydia Icaza Ordonez, Le Mai Tu
Affiliations

The effect of a 6 Fr catheter on flow rate in men

Patrick Richard et al. Urol Ann. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The pressure-flow study (PFS) is considered the gold standard for the detection of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in men. However, several studies have raised the possibility that transurethral catheterization might have an obstructive effect on PFS while others did not.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of a 6 Fr transurethral catheter on the pressure-flow study and to evaluate its clinical implication in men.

Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review study of 515 men referred for an evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms and who underwent an urodynamic study (UDS). Of those, 133 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Non invasive free-flow studies (NIFFS) were performed before every UDS. Cystometrogram and PFS were performed through a 6 Fr transurethral catheter.

Results: The maximal flow rate (Qmax) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the NIFFS (15.0 mL/s (range 9.0-23.0)) than in the PFS (11.0 mL/s (range 7.0-18.5)). This difference became greater (18.5 mL/s (range 10.0-30.3) vs. 13.0 mL/s (range 6.0-25.0), in favor of the NIFFS) when we analyzed only the patients (n = 34) who voided a similar volume. According to the International Continence Society (ICS) nomogram, the use of the PFS alone would have resulted in the upstaging of 14% of cases (10/71) in the overall population and 24% (4/17) in the sub-analyzed group.

Conclusion: A 6 Fr transurethral catheter significantly lowers the maximal flow rate by 4 mL/s. Its presence resulted in an upstaging on the ICS nomogram. However, further studies will be necessary to confirm this upstaging.

Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; bladder outlet obstruction; maximum flow rate; pressure-flow study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

References

    1. Roehrborn CG. Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) Med Clin North Am. 2011;95:87–100. - PubMed
    1. Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: The gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7:S14–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffiths D, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spångberg A, Gleason D. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16:1–18. - PubMed
    1. Abrams P, Bruskewitz R, De La Rosette J, Griffiths D, Koyanagi T, Nordling J, et al. The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: Urodynamics. In: Cockett AT, Khoury S, Aso Y, Chatelain C, Denis L, Griffiths K, et al., editors. Monaco: Proceedings of the 3rd International Consultation on BPH. 26-28 June 1995, SCI; 1996. pp. 299–367.
    1. Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG, Kaplan SA, Axelrod S. Bladder outlet obstruction versus impaired detrusor contractility: The role of uroflow. J Urol. 1991;145:810–2. - PubMed