Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;20(6):e512-21.
doi: 10.3747/co.20.1487.

Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge-practice gap

Affiliations

Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge-practice gap

R Urquhart et al. Curr Oncol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Health services researchers have consistently identified a gap between what is identified as "best practice" and what actually happens in clinical care. Despite nearly two decades of a growing evidence-based practice movement, narrowing the knowledge-practice gap continues to be a slow, complex, and poorly understood process. Here, we contend that cross-disciplinary research is increasingly relevant and important to reducing that gap, particularly research that encompasses the notion of transdisciplinarity, wherein multiple academic disciplines and non-academic individuals and groups are integrated into the research process. The assimilation of diverse perspectives, research approaches, and types of knowledge is potentially effective in helping research teams tackle real-world patient care issues, create more practice-based evidence, and translate the results to clinical and community care settings. The goals of this paper are to present and discuss cross-disciplinary approaches to health research and to provide two examples of how engaging in such research may optimize the use of research in cancer care.

Keywords: Knowledge translation; cancer; cross-disciplinary research; evidence-based practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39(suppl 2):II46–54. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108002-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–63. 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (cscc) The Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control: A Cancer Plan for Canada. Ottawa, ON: CSCC Governing Council; 2006. [discussion paper]
    1. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources