Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e81036.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081036. eCollection 2013.

Knee adduction moment and medial contact force--facts about their correlation during gait

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Knee adduction moment and medial contact force--facts about their correlation during gait

Ines Kutzner et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The external knee adduction moment is considered a surrogate measure for the medial tibiofemoral contact force and is commonly used to quantify the load reducing effect of orthopedic interventions. However, only limited and controversial data exist about the correlation between adduction moment and medial force. The objective of this study was to examine whether the adduction moment is indeed a strong predictor for the medial force by determining their correlation during gait. Instrumented knee implants with telemetric data transmission were used to measure tibiofemoral contact forces in nine subjects. Gait analyses were performed simultaneously to the joint load measurements. Skeletal kinematics, as well as the ground reaction forces and inertial parameters, were used as inputs in an inverse dynamics approach to calculate the external knee adduction moment. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between adduction moment and medial force for the whole stance phase and separately for the early and late stance phase. Whereas only moderate correlations between adduction moment and medial force were observed throughout the whole stance phase (R(2) = 0.56) and during the late stance phase (R(2) = 0.51), a high correlation was observed at the early stance phase (R(2) = 0.76). Furthermore, the adduction moment was highly correlated to the medial force ratio throughout the whole stance phase (R(2) = 0.75). These results suggest that the adduction moment is a surrogate measure, well-suited to predicting the medial force ratio throughout the whole stance phase or medial force during the early stance phase. However, particularly during the late stance phase, moderate correlations and high inter-individual variations revealed that the predictive value of the adduction moment is limited. Further analyses are necessary to examine whether a combination of other kinematic, kinetic or neuromuscular factors may lead to a more reliable prediction of the force magnitude.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Medial contact forces Fmed (A) and external adduction moments EAM (B) during the stance phase of gait.
Forces are given in % of bodyweight (BW) and moments in %BW times height (Ht). Average curves from 6 repeated trials per subject were calculated using a dynamic time warping procedure .
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation between external adduction moments EAM and medial contact forces Fmed during gait.
Correlation between EAM and Fmed during the whole (A), early (C) and late (D) stance phase of gait and correlation between EAM and medial force ratio (B) during the whole stance phase (6 trials per subject).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Correlation between peak medial forces Fmed and external adduction moments EAM.
Correlation between peak values of Fmed (A) or medial force ratios (B) and EAM at early stance (peak 1) and late stance phase (peak 2). Average peak values of nine subjects.

References

    1. Andriacchi TP, Mündermann A, Smith RL, Alexander EJ, Dyrby CO, et al. (2004) A Framework for the in Vivo Pathomechanics of Osteoarthritis at the Knee. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 32: 447–457. - PubMed
    1. Heijink A, Gomoll A, Madry H, Drobnič M, Filardo G, et al. (2012) Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 20: 423–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson B, Wluka A, Teichtahl A, Morris M, Cicuttini F (2004) Reviewing knee osteoarthritis - a biomechanical perspective. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 7: 347–357. - PubMed
    1. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP (1991) Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 9: 113–119. - PubMed
    1. Hurwitz DE, Ryals AB, Case JP, Block JA, Andriacchi TP (2002) The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 20: 101–107. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources