Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 8:13:1144.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1144.

A cross-sectional survey of experts' opinions about the relative effectiveness of tobacco control strategies for the general population versus disadvantaged groups: what do we choose in the absence of evidence?

Christine L Paul  1 , Heidi Turon, Billie Bonevski, Jamie Bryant, Patrick McElduff
Affiliations

A cross-sectional survey of experts' opinions about the relative effectiveness of tobacco control strategies for the general population versus disadvantaged groups: what do we choose in the absence of evidence?

Christine L Paul et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: There is a clear disparity in smoking rates according to social disadvantage. In the absence of sufficiently robust data regarding effective strategies for reducing smoking prevalence in disadvantaged populations, understanding the views of tobacco control experts can assist with funding decisions and research agendas.

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted with 192 respondents (response rate 65%) sampled from the Australian and New Zealand Tobacco Control Contacts list and a literature search. Respondents were asked to indicate whether a number of tobacco control strategies were perceived to be effective for each of: the general population; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; those with a low income; and people with a mental illness.

Results: A high proportion of respondents indicated that mass media and increased tobacco taxation (84% and 89% respectively) were effective for the general population. Significantly lower proportions reported these two strategies were effective for sub-populations, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (58% and 63% respectively, p's < .0001). Subsidised medication was the only strategy associated with a greater proportion of respondents perceiving it to be effective in disadvantaged sub-populations compared to the general population. Tailored quit programs and culturally relevant programs were nominated as additional effective strategies for disadvantaged populations.

Conclusions: Views about subsidised medications in particular, suggest the need for robust cost-effectiveness data relevant to disadvantaged groups to avoid wastage of scarce tobacco control resources. Strategies perceived to be effective for disadvantaged populations such as tailored or culturally relevant programs require rigorous evaluation so that potential adoption of these approaches is evidence-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of respondents endorsing population-level tobacco control strategies as effective for each population (* p <0.0001 compared to the general population).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of respondents endorsing individual-level tobacco control strategies as effective for each population (* p <0.0001 compared to the general population).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glover JD, Hetzel DM, Tennant SK. The socioeconomic gradient and chronic illness and associated risk factors in Australia. Aust N Z Health Policy. 2004;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-1-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham H, Inskip H, Francis B, Harman J. Pathways of disadvantage and smoking careers: evidence and policy implications. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;13:ii7–ii12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, Siahpush M, Scollo M, Simpson JA, Chapman S, White V, Hill D. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2008;13(9):1443–1450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Drug statistics series no 25. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011. 2010 national drug strategy household survey report.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Drug statistics series no 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008. 2007 national drug strategy household survey: detailed findings.

Publication types