Targeted vaccine selection in influenza vaccination
- PMID: 24314622
- PMCID: PMC3859908
- DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0793
Targeted vaccine selection in influenza vaccination
Abstract
Background: The main target groups for influenza vaccination are the elderly, the chronically ill, infants, and toddlers. Influenza vaccines are needed that suit the immunological particularities of each of these age and risk groups. Recent years have seen the approval of influenza vaccines that are more immunogenic than before, but whose use in Germany is limited by the restriction of reimbursement to a small number of vaccines.
Methods: The Medline database was selectively searched for pertinent literature.
Results: The suboptimal immunogenicity of conventional influenza vaccines that contain inactivated viral cleavage products and subunits can be markedly improved by the use of squalene-based adjuvant systems, by the integration of viral antigens in virosomal particles, or by intradermal administration. The vaccination of elderly persons with a vaccine containing the adjuvant MF59 was found to lower the risk of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia by 25% compared to vaccination with a trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV). On the other hand, the adjuvant ASO3 was found to be associated with an up to 17-fold increase in the frequency of narcolepsy among 4- to 18-year-olds. In a prospective study, a virosomal vaccine lowered the frequency of laboratory-confirmed influenza in vaccinated children by 88% compared to unvaccinated children (2 versus 18 cases per 1000 individuals). A live, attenuated influenza vaccine lowered the rate of disease in children up to age 7 by 48% compared to a TIV (4.2% versus 8.1%).
Conclusion: The newer vaccines possess improved efficacy when used for primary and booster immunization in certain age and risk groups, and they are superior in this respect to conventional vaccines based on viral cleavage products and subunits. The risk/benefit profiles of all currently available vaccines vary depending on the age group or risk group in which they are used.
Comment in
-
Influenza vaccination and the end of simplicity.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Nov 22;110(47):791-2. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0791. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 24314621 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
High vaccination rate is crucial.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Feb 28;111(9):150. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0150a. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014. PMID: 24661589 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In reply.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Feb 28;111(9):150. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0150b. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014. PMID: 24661590 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Pfleiderer M. Prävention/Impfen: H1N1-Update 2009. In: Zepp F, Ruf BR, editors. Kompendium Influenza. Wiesbaden: 2009. med update 2009.
-
- Belshe RB. The need for quadrivalent vaccine against seasonal influenza. Vaccine. 2010;28:45–53. - PubMed
-
- Keitel WA, Atmar RL, Cate TR, et al. Safety of high doses of influenza vaccine and effect on antibody responses in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1121–1127. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
