Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences
- PMID: 24314906
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.054
Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences
Abstract
Background context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. No single MRI sequence has been shown to be superior in spinal canal measurements. There are also cost concerns for the increased clinical and research use of MRI. Using only a single sequence may lower the financial burden; however, this requires spinal canal measurements in both T1 and T2 MRI to be reliable. Evidence for this is currently lacking.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-reader reliability of MRI measurements of the lumbar spine and the reliability of measurements using T1- and T2-weighted MRI films.
Study design/setting: Retrospective study.
Patient sample: Forty-two randomly selected patients who underwent spinal stenosis surgery.
Outcome measures: Lumbar spinal canal measurements and reliability analysis between T1- and T2-weighted MRI.
Methods: Qualitative ratings of MRI features were performed according to previously published criteria by 2 independent readers (JP-YC, HS). Measurements in axial scan included midline anteroposterior (AP) vertebral body diameter, midvertebral body width, midline AP spinal canal diameter, midline AP dural sac diameter, spinal canal width/interpedicular distance, pedicle width (right and left), and lamina angle. Measurements in the sagittal scan included midline AP body diameter, midvertebral body height, and AP spinal canal diameter. Cronbach alpha was used to characterize intra- and inter-reader reliability for qualitative rating data. Similarly, T1 and T2 comparison also was performed in the same manner.
Results: Good to excellent intra- and interobserver reliability was obtained for all measurements. Reliability analysis of all T1 and T2 measurements was excellent.
Conclusions: Either T1 or T2 images can be used for measurements of spinal canal dimensions. These findings are of importance, as not every patient undergoing preoperative MRI assessment will necessarily have both sequences performed and only a single sequence is required for research studies. Our findings are also of relevance in measurement of lumbar canal diameters.
Keywords: Canal; MRI; Spinal; Stenosis; T1; T2.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.385. Spine J. 2005. PMID: 16291100 Clinical Trial.
-
Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 May;158(5):981-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2777-5. Epub 2016 Mar 23. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016. PMID: 27005673 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1605-10. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181791af3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 18552677 Free PMC article.
-
Intraosseous pseudomeningocele of the mobile spine: a case report and review of the literature.Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(Suppl 3):472-476. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5498-z. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29388089 Review.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading Systems for Central Canal and Neural Foraminal Stenoses of the Lumbar and Cervical Spines With a Focus on the Lee Grading System.Korean J Radiol. 2023 Mar;24(3):224-234. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0351. Epub 2022 May 29. Korean J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36788771 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The paradoxical relationship between ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016 Sep 5;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0088-5. eCollection 2016. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016. PMID: 27635416 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.J Anesth Clin Res. 2019;10(2):878. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000878. Epub 2019 Feb 25. J Anesth Clin Res. 2019. PMID: 31179158 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic indices for lumbar developmental spinal stenosis.Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Feb 20;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0113-3. eCollection 2017. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017. PMID: 28239663 Free PMC article.
-
Cost analysis comparison between conventional microsurgical decompression and full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):721-728. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-552. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 33447674 Free PMC article.
-
AI-based CT assessment of 3117 vertebrae reveals significant sex-specific vertebral height differences.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05091-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40595983 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical