Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar;39(2):171-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9861-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

Radiation tolerance of contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Radiation tolerance of contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Michael Mollerus et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are complex instruments using integrated circuit technology. Previous studies suggested risk to the device when exposed to a radiation environment. Little data is available on contemporary ICD systems.

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to assess the ability of contemporary ICD designs to resist the damaging effects of direct exposure to therapeutic doses of radiation.

Methods: Four contemporary ICDs and four legacy ICDs devices were exposed to escalating doses of photon irradiation (XRT) from a 6-MV linear accelerator. Escalating doses were administered over 8 days to a maximum cumulative dose of 131.11 Gy or catastrophic failure.

Results: Each legacy device had catastrophic failure following the 6th XRT session, characterized by failure to deliver shock therapy. All four contemporary devices remained fully functional following the 8th and final XRT session (P = 0.03). The cumulative, survived radiation dose was significantly different between the contemporary and legacy groups (131.11 vs. 41.11 Gy, P = 0.01). Changes seen in the legacy devices were sudden and not anticipated by trends in prior sessions.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that contemporary ICD designs may be more robust than earlier designs in a radiation environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984 Oct;10(10):1967-9 - PubMed
    1. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Aug;5(8):1201-3 - PubMed
    1. Europace. 2004 Jul;6(4):363-9 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Dec;14(12):2143-53 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1994 Sep;106(3):955-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources