Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;91(4):738-70.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12032.

Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research

Affiliations
Review

Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research

Ross Millar et al. Milbank Q. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Recurring problems with patient safety have led to a growing interest in helping hospitals' governing bodies provide more effective oversight of the quality and safety of their services. National directives and initiatives emphasize the importance of action by boards, but the empirical basis for informing effective hospital board oversight has yet to receive full and careful review.

Methods: This article presents a narrative review of empirical research to inform the debate about hospital boards' oversight of quality and patient safety. A systematic and comprehensive search identified 122 papers for detailed review. Much of the empirical work appeared in the last ten years, is from the United States, and employs cross-sectional survey methods.

Findings: Recent empirical studies linking board composition and processes with patient outcomes have found clear differences between high- and low-performing hospitals, highlighting the importance of strong and committed leadership that prioritizes quality and safety and sets clear and measurable goals for improvement. Effective oversight is also associated with well-informed and skilled board members. External factors (such as regulatory regimes and the publication of performance data) might also have a role in influencing boards, but detailed empirical work on these is scant.

Conclusions: Health policy debates recognize the important role of hospital boards in overseeing patient quality and safety, and a growing body of empirical research has sought to elucidate that role. This review finds a number of areas of guidance that have some empirical support, but it also exposes the relatively inchoate nature of the field. Greater theoretical and methodological development is required if we are to secure more evidence-informed governance systems and practices that can contribute to safer care.

Keywords: governing boards; patient safety; quality improvement; trustees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results of the systematic search of board oversight and patient safety.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander JA, Lee SY. Does Governance Matter? Board Configuration and Performance in Not-for-Profit Hospitals. The Milbank Quarterly. 2006;84:733–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander JA, Weiner BJ, Succi M. Community Accountability among Hospitals Affiliated with Health Care Systems. The Milbank Quarterly. 2000;78:157–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander JA, Young GJ, Weiner BJ, Hearld LR. How Do System-Affiliated Hospitals Fare in Providing Community Benefit? Inquiry. 2009;46(1):72–91. - PubMed
    1. Bader BS. CQI Progress Reports: The Dashboard Approach Provides a Better Way to Keep Board Informed about Quality. Healthcare Executive. 1993;8:8–11. - PubMed
    1. Bader BS. Best Practices for Board Quality Committees. Great Boards. 2006 Available at http://www.greatboards.org/newsletter/reprints/Board_quality_committees_... (accessed July 10, 2013)

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources