Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;40(12):121714.
doi: 10.1118/1.4829512.

Monte Carlo and analytical model predictions of leakage neutron exposures from passively scattered proton therapy

Affiliations

Monte Carlo and analytical model predictions of leakage neutron exposures from passively scattered proton therapy

Angélica Pérez-Andújar et al. Med Phys. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Stray neutron radiation is of concern after radiation therapy, especially in children, because of the high risk it might carry for secondary cancers. Several previous studies predicted the stray neutron exposure from proton therapy, mostly using Monte Carlo simulations. Promising attempts to develop analytical models have also been reported, but these were limited to only a few proton beam energies. The purpose of this study was to develop an analytical model to predict leakage neutron equivalent dose from passively scattered proton beams in the 100-250-MeV interval.

Methods: To develop and validate the analytical model, the authors used values of equivalent dose per therapeutic absorbed dose (H∕D) predicted with Monte Carlo simulations. The authors also characterized the behavior of the mean neutron radiation-weighting factor, wR, as a function of depth in a water phantom and distance from the beam central axis.

Results: The simulated and analytical predictions agreed well. On average, the percentage difference between the analytical model and the Monte Carlo simulations was 10% for the energies and positions studied. The authors found that wR was highest at the shallowest depth and decreased with depth until around 10 cm, where it started to increase slowly with depth. This was consistent among all energies.

Conclusion: Simple analytical methods are promising alternatives to complex and slow Monte Carlo simulations to predict H∕D values. The authors' results also provide improved understanding of the behavior of wR which strongly depends on depth, but is nearly independent of lateral distance from the beam central axis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated water phantom with 100 spherical detecting volumes placed along the CAX and at 10 cm OAX, 40 cm OAX, and 80 cm OAX at the same depths. d represents the distance from the neutron effective source to the detecting volumes. d is the distance from the surface of the phantom to the detecting volumes. diso is the distance from the effective neutron source to isocenter. z is the depth in the phantom. Figure modified from Zhang et al. (Ref. 25).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Normalized neutron energy spectra produced by 120-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton beams at a depth of 10 cm at CAX.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Monte Carlo calculation and analytical model prediction of neutron equivalent dose per therapeutic dose (H/D) values along the CAX at 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Monte Carlo calculation and analytical model prediction of neutron equivalent dose per therapeutic dose (H/D) values at 10 cm OAX at 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Monte Carlo calculation and analytical model prediction for neutron equivalent dose per therapeutic dose (H/D) values at 40 cm OAX at 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Monte Carlo calculation and analytical model prediction for neutron equivalent dose per therapeutic dose (H/D) values at 80 cm OAX at 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Monte Carlo calculation and analytical model prediction of the neutron equivalent dose per therapeutic dose (H/D) values at various OAX positions at 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies at a depth of 22 cm in the phantom.
Figure 8
Figure 8
wR¯ values for each detecting volume position along CAX and lateral to CAX for 100-, 160-, 200-, and 250-MeV proton energies. wR¯ was calculated using the formalism from ICRP Publication 92 (Ref. 32) and the neutron spectral fluence calculated in our work.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Fit for wR¯. The fit is presented as a function of depth at positions along CAX and at various OAX positions. Each type of symbol in the plot represents an energy. The plot includes all the energies at CAX and 10 40, and 80 cm OAX.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Inskip P. D., Ries L. A. G., Cohen R. J., and Curtis R. E., “Chapter 18: New maligancies following childhood cancer,” New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 2006).
    1. Fraumeni J. F., Curtis R. E., Edwards A. C., and Tucker M. A., “Chapter 1: Introduction,” New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 2006).
    1. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, “Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy,” ICRU Report No. 78 (ICRU Publications, Bethesda, MD, 2007).
    1. Newhauser W. D., Fontenot J. D., Mahajan A., Kornguth D., Stovall M., Zheng Y., Taddei P. J., Mirkovic D., Mohan R., Cox J. D., and Woo S., “The risk of developing a second cancer after receiving craniospinal proton irradiation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2277–2291 (2009).10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hecksel D., Sandison G. A., Farr J. B., and Edwards A. C., “Scattered neutron dose equivalent from an active scanning proton beam delivery system,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 30, 326–330 (2007). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources