Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar;40(3):853-7.
doi: 10.1111/jog.12260. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Hysteroscopy and suction evacuation of cesarean scar pregnancies: a case report and review

Affiliations
Review

Hysteroscopy and suction evacuation of cesarean scar pregnancies: a case report and review

Donald L Fylstra. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Implantation of a pregnancy into the scar of a prior cesarean is an uncommon type of ectopic pregnancy. The incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy is thought to be one in 1800-2216 pregnancies. The increase in the incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy is thought to be a consequence of the increasing rates of cesarean delivery. The natural history of cesarean scar pregnancy is unknown. However, if such a pregnancy is allowed to continue, uterine scar rupture with hemorrhage and possible hysterectomy seem likely. Two early diagnosed cesarean scar pregnancies were treated with hysteroscopy and suction curettage removal. One required intramuscular methotrexate to resolve a persistent cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. It would seem reasonable that simple suction evacuation would frequently leave chorionic villi imbedded within the cesarean scar, as the pregnancy is not within the endometrial cavity.

Keywords: cesarean scar pregnancy; ectopic pregnancy; hysteroscopy; persistent ectopic; suction curettage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by